Blackbody Prediction for CMBR: Alpher, Herman, and Gamow's 1948 Theory

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter TrickyDicky
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Blackbody Cmbr
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the historical prediction of the cosmic microwave background radiation (CMBR) as a blackbody spectrum, specifically focusing on the contributions of Alpher, Herman, and Gamow in 1948. Participants seek to clarify when and how this prediction was made, exploring the context of cosmological theories and historical developments in the field.

Discussion Character

  • Historical, Conceptual clarification, Meta-discussion

Main Points Raised

  • One participant inquires about the specific prediction of the blackbody nature of CMBR prior to its detection, indicating a focus on historical context rather than conceptual understanding.
  • Another participant references Dicke and colleagues' reasoning regarding the Big Bang's release of radiation and its implications for detecting the CMBR, discussing the conditions of the early universe and the transition to a transparent state.
  • A third participant expresses that the previous responses did not address their specific question about the historical prediction of the blackbody quality of the CMBR, suggesting a need for more focused historical insights.
  • Additional links are provided by participants to external resources that may contain relevant information about the Big Bang and CMBR, though their relevance to the specific question remains uncertain.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not appear to reach a consensus on the specific historical prediction of the CMBR's blackbody nature, with some focusing on broader cosmological theories and others seeking more precise historical details.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights a gap in historical documentation regarding the prediction of the blackbody spectrum of CMBR, with participants noting the need for clarity on this aspect of cosmological history.

TrickyDicky
Messages
3,507
Reaction score
28
I know the CMBR temperature was approximately predicted by Alpher ,Herman and Gamow around 1948, but I can't locate a source specifying when and how the blackbody form of the CMBR was predicted.
Does anybody have this information?

thanks
 
Space news on Phys.org
How about this:
Dicke and his colleagues reasoned that the Big Bang must have scattered not only the matter that condensed into galaxies but also must have released a tremendous blast of radiation. With the proper instrumentation, this radiation should be detectable.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discovery_of_cosmic_microwave_background_radiatio

and:
After 10−6 seconds, the early universe was made up of a hot plasma of photons, electrons, and baryons. The photons were constantly interacting with the plasma through Thomson scattering. As the universe expanded, adiabatic cooling caused the plasma to cool until it became favorable for electrons to combine with protons and form hydrogen atoms. This recombination event happened at around 3000 K or when the universe was approximately 379,000 years old.[8][nb 4] At this point, the photons scattered off the now electrically neutral atoms and began to travel freely through space, resulting in the decoupling of matter and radiation.[9]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discovery_of_cosmic_microwave_background_radiation

Basically, the early universe was hot plasma and hot plasma emits a black body spectrum of radiation. When it cooled below a certain temperature and matter started to condense into atoms, it became transparent. That temperature is the temperature at which the radiation was then released to travel unabated through the universe as the CMB.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Yes, I read that in wikipedia. But that is not what I asked, I was interested in knowing if and when someone, before CMBR was detected, had specifically predicted the almost perfect blackbody quality of this radiation. It is more of a cosmology history question than a conceptual question.
Perhaps somebody has studied this in this cosmology forum?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
5K
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
8K