Blondel's Theorem: A Math Mystery Explained

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter navanath
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mystery Theorem
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Blondel's Theorem, established by engineer Andre E. Blondel in 1893, outlines the fundamental principles for metering alternating current circuits. The theorem states that the number of stators required for accurate energy metering is one less than the total number of wires in the circuit, including the neutral. For instance, a 2-wire circuit necessitates a single stator meter, while a 3-wire circuit requires a two-stator meter. Although modern metering devices, such as the form 2S house meter, may deviate from this theorem, inaccuracies can arise in unbalanced voltage scenarios, emphasizing the importance of voltage balance over current balance.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of alternating current (AC) circuit theory
  • Familiarity with electrical metering concepts
  • Knowledge of voltage and current balance in electrical systems
  • Basic principles of electrical engineering
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the design and functionality of form 2S house meters
  • Study the implications of voltage imbalance in AC circuits
  • Explore advanced metering techniques and technologies
  • Learn about the historical context of electrical metering developments
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineers, metering technicians, and students of electrical engineering who seek to understand the principles of accurate energy metering in alternating current circuits.

navanath
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
tell me somthing about blondels theorem
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Hi navanath ! Welcome to PF! :smile:

From "[URL …
Welcome to the Underground Overhead Metering School home page. This non-profit school provides professional training for the dedicated electrical linemen and technicians that provide safe and reliable electrical energy throughout the United States. This school would not be possible without the support and dedication of vendors, manufacturers, and planning committee membe

Blondel’s Theorem​

Metering theory for alternating current circuits was in its infancy in the early 1890’s. In 1893 an engineer by the name of Andre E. Blondel set forth the basic rules for metering all alternating current circuits.

Simply stated:

Count the number of wires in any circuit (including the neutral). One less stator than the total number of wires in the circuit is required to correctly meter the energy flowing in the circuit.
For example:
A 2-wire circuit requires a single stator meter.
A 3-wire circuit requires a two-stator meter.
A 4-wire circuit requires a three-stator meter.

In practice, Blondel’s Theorem is not strictly adhered to in all metering applications. Meter manufacturers have found ways to design special meters that allow adequate accuracy without the required number of stators. One such meter is the common (form 2S) house meter. It is a single stator meter that is specifically designed to meter a 3-wire circuit. In addition, some metering circuits may be connected in special configurations, which may also provide adequate levels of accuracy without the required number of stators.

A quite appropriate question to ask is, "Was Blondel wrong"? The answer is, "No"! Any time a metering circuit does not strictly adhere to Blondel’s Theorem, it is subject to inaccuracies when the voltages present in the circuits are not balanced. Once again, to emphasize the previous sentence, when cheating on Blondel’s Theorem, it is the balance of the voltages that are important, not the balance of currents flowing in the circuits! Most voltages in modern alternating current circuits are adequately balanced to permit these deviations from the rules laid forth by Blondel.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
5K
  • · Replies 70 ·
3
Replies
70
Views
2K
  • · Replies 72 ·
3
Replies
72
Views
8K