Boltzmann equation for annihilation

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the Boltzmann equation for annihilation as presented in Dodelson's textbook. Participants clarify the components of the equation, specifically addressing the role of the delta functions in ensuring energy and momentum conservation, and the significance of the amplitude |M| in the context of particle interactions. The conversation emphasizes the importance of proper notation and understanding the relationship between particle density, distribution functions, and the rate of change in particle abundance.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Boltzmann equation in statistical mechanics
  • Familiarity with particle physics concepts, including annihilation processes
  • Knowledge of delta functions and their role in conservation laws
  • Basic proficiency in integrals and normalization in quantum field theory
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Boltzmann equation for annihilation in detail
  • Learn about the significance of the amplitude |M| in particle interactions
  • Explore the implications of delta functions in momentum and energy conservation
  • Investigate the normalization factors in quantum field theory integrals
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, graduate students in theoretical physics, and researchers focusing on particle interactions and statistical mechanics will benefit from this discussion.

happyparticle
Messages
490
Reaction score
24
TL;DR
Trying to understand the right hand side of the Boltzmann equation for annihilation for the rate of change in the abundance of a given particle.
In the Dodelson's textbook, the author introduce the Boltzmann equation for annihilation.

##a^{-3} \frac{d(n_1 a)}{dt} = \int \frac{d^3 p_1}{(2 \pi)^3 2E_1} \int \frac{d^3 p_2}{(2 \pi)^3 2E_2} \int \frac{d^3 p_3}{(2 \pi)^3 2E_3} \int \frac{d^3 p_4}{(2 \pi)^3 2E_4} \times (2 \pi)^4 \delta^3 (p_1 + p_2 - p_3 - p_4) \delta (E_1 + E_2 - E_3 - E_4)|M|^2 \times {f_3 f_4[1 \pm f_1] [1 \pm f_2] - f_1 f_2 [1 \pm f_3] [1 \pm f_4]}##

I don't understand the right hand part of the equation. Where all the part comes from? Why ##p_i, f_i## are outside of the integrals? What |M| means? I can't figure out how all the right hand side is related to the rate of change in the abundance of a given particle.

I'm guessing that ##n_i## is the particle density and ##f_i## is the the expected number of particles in an energy state.
 
Space news on Phys.org
happyparticle said:
Why ##p_i, f_i## are outside of the integrals?
They are not.

happyparticle said:
What |M| means?
That would be the amplitude of the annihilation.

happyparticle said:
I can't figure out how all the right hand side is related to the rate of change in the abundance of a given particle.
Rate of change = production - annihilation

The delta functions ensure energy and momentum conservation. The distribution functions implement rates - including fermi blocking etc. The integrals integrate over all possible states. You are missing parentheses around the f terms.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ohwilleke
Thank you for the explanation.
However, I'm not sure how exactly the delta functions ensure the energy and moment conservation. Also, I don't see why there is a ##(2 \pi)^4## and ##\delta^3##.

I was looking for a full derivation of this equation. Unfortunately, I can't find any. I'm wondering if I'm using the right name for the equation.
 
The ##\delta^3## is momentum conservation. Try writing out the conditions for the deltas being nob-zero!

The factors of ##2\pi## are for correct normalization.
 
Orodruin said:
The ##\delta^3## is momentum conservation. Try writing out the conditions for the deltas being nob-zero!
Thus, I have ##\delta(0)^3 = \infty## which give a infinite rate of change. I don't understand.
 
happyparticle said:
Thus, I have ##\delta(0)^3 = \infty## which give a infinite rate of change. I don't understand.
This is wrong. Do you know how to evaluate the simple 3D integral ##\intop_{\text{All Space}}d^{3}x\,f\left(\vec{x}\right)\delta^{3}\left(\vec{x}-\vec{x}_{0}\right)##?
 
happyparticle said:
Thus, I have ##\delta(0)^3 = \infty## which give a infinite rate of change. I don't understand.
No you don’t. It is inside several integrals over momenta and essentially ensures that the momenta that you integrate over satisfy momentum and energy conservation
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: weirdoguy

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K