Boost Your Grade: Should You Retake Linear Algebra as a Freshman in College?

  • Thread starter Thread starter selig5560
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on whether a freshman should retake Linear Algebra after receiving a C grade, particularly for those intending to pursue graduate studies in applied mathematics. Participants emphasize the importance of mastering proofs and suggest that a solid understanding of Linear Algebra is crucial for future courses like Numerical Analysis and Differential Equations. Recommendations include taking an "Introduction to Proofs" course and studying supplementary materials such as Arnold's "Ordinary Differential Equations" to enhance comprehension and prepare for advanced topics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Linear Algebra concepts and applications
  • Familiarity with proofs in mathematics
  • Basic knowledge of Ordinary Differential Equations (ODEs)
  • Experience with programming in MATLAB
NEXT STEPS
  • Research "Introduction to Proofs" courses available at your institution
  • Study Arnold's "Ordinary Differential Equations" for deeper theoretical understanding
  • Explore Numerical Analysis and Numerical Linear Algebra topics
  • Practice solving Linear Algebra problems to improve proficiency
USEFUL FOR

Freshman students in mathematics, particularly those majoring in applied mathematics, and anyone preparing for graduate studies in related fields.

selig5560
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I just finished my Linear Algebra (A-level) class and I'm ending up with a C to a BC, and am wondering if I should retake it. If this is of any relation, but I got the C because I'm still trying to get adjusted to college life (I'm a freshman.) My intended major is applied mathematics.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
selig5560 said:
Hi,

I just finished my Linear Algebra (A-level) class and I'm ending up with a C to a BC, and am wondering if I should retake it. If this is of any relation, but I got the C because I'm still trying to get adjusted to college life (I'm a freshman.) My intended major is applied mathematics.


In applied math you can use ODEs, PDEs, Linear Alg, Programming, and Engineering type applications. I am working on a MS in Applied Math, and at my program, we have more programming and ODEs and PDEs. However, we program MatLab. So Linear Alg isn't presence in many of my classes. However, I can use it (Lin Alg) to solve a problem even though it could be done with another method.

The answer to your question is it depends. Will you be attending grad school in applied math? If so, what will the focus be on? More programming, more DEs, Linear Alg problems, Engineering?

If I was in your shoes, I would probably re-take. If this was a Number Theory class and I know I wasn't going into pure math, I would take the C-BC.
 
Hey thanks for the reply. I do intend to go to graduate school. My main interest is numerical methods. Later on I plan tot ake Numerical Analysis, Numerical Linear Algebra, Differential Equations, etc. Though I was given a C for my grade, I feel that a good portion of the tests were proofs (which I am not good at) and was a contributing factor to my decrepid grade.
 
selig5560 said:
Hey thanks for the reply. I do intend to go to graduate school. My main interest is numerical methods. Later on I plan tot ake Numerical Analysis, Numerical Linear Algebra, Differential Equations, etc. Though I was given a C for my grade, I feel that a good portion of the tests were proofs (which I am not good at) and was a contributing factor to my decrepid grade.

Get better at them. Proofs are what mathematics is all about.
Even if you go into a purely applied area of mathematics, you won't be able to do anything novel or innovative (read: your job) without being comfortable with proofs. A good course in abstract algebra will cure what ails you.
 
Last edited:
Thanks again for the info. I do plan to get better with proofs, even though they are tough, I do find them interesting. Btw how difficult is ODE compared to LA?
 
selig5560 said:
Thanks again for the info. I do plan to get better with proofs, even though they are tough, I do find them interesting. Btw how difficult is ODE compared to LA?

Hard to say. Intro. linear algebra tends to be more dense and abstract than introductory ODE's, but is computationally and technically much simpler once you wrap your head around the theory; ODE, on the other hand, will offer you next to no theory or abstraction, and will consist mostly of a long list of different kinds of equations and associated techniques required to solve them. It's mostly a "cookbook" course.

It would be worthwhile, I think, to pick up a book like Arnold's Ordinary Differential Equations to read alongside the course text if you take ODE's. It's probably a bit too challenging to study on your own at this point, but it will place a lot of what you're learning in a larger context and give you a lot of the theory that the course itself will almost certainly ignore. Eventually, you'll want to work through the book in its entirety.
 
Last edited:
Hey, thanks for all the feedback, really appreciate it. That book looks pretty dense. (ok, I'm a freshman lol)
 
selig5560 said:
Hey, thanks for all the feedback, really appreciate it. That book looks pretty dense. (ok, I'm a freshman lol)

No need to work through through it right now, but it's something you'll definitely want to work towards (even if you're studying applied mathematics). If your school has an "introduction to proofs" or "introduction to higher mathematics" course, I strongly recommend taking it as soon as possible; it will help you become comfortable with the kind of abstraction you encounter in courses like LA.
 
selig5560 said:
how difficult is ODE compared to LA?

I found Linear Algebra to be more abstract and more difficult in that sense, but I had more trouble with the exams in ODE. I studied for 10 hours for one exam in ODE, which was an absurd amount compared to how much I normally study. I think one reason it was so confusing to me was that I could push through the algorithms if I had the book in front of me, but I didn't really have a deep understanding of how or why anything actually worked. Part of it was also that our professor was new and our textbook was terrible. (If someone tries to use Borelli and Coleman on you, RUN THE OTHER WAY. Or buy a better book to supplement with.)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
41
Views
7K