Boosting Nuclei Spin: The Role of Angular Momentum & Circularly-Polarized Light

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter gildomar
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Nuclei
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the methods of creating high-spin nuclei, specifically examining the role of angular momentum and the potential use of circularly-polarized light, such as gamma rays, to influence nuclear spin. Participants explore theoretical and experimental aspects of these processes.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that high-spin nuclei can be created by colliding nuclei off-center to impart angular momentum during fusion.
  • Others question whether circularly-polarized light, particularly gamma rays, could also add angular momentum to a target nucleus, suggesting that this might be theoretically possible if the correct frequency for a transition is achieved.
  • One participant expresses uncertainty about the energy levels necessary to change the spin of nucleons and notes the complexity involved in determining the proper energy for rotationally excited states.
  • Another participant highlights the challenges of focusing particle beams with precision, suggesting that off-center collisions are common and may complicate the process.
  • There is a concern about the lack of existing research on the use of circularly-polarized light for this purpose, with a desire to avoid duplicating prior work.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the feasibility of using circularly-polarized light to influence nuclear spin, and multiple competing views remain regarding the methods and challenges involved in creating high-spin nuclei.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include uncertainties about the necessary energy levels for transitions, the precision of beam focusing, and the complexity of achieving rotationally excited states in nuclei.

gildomar
Messages
98
Reaction score
2
I know that in order to create a high-spin nucleus, that you slam a nucleus into the target nucleus off-center so that when they fuse, it has a large angular momentum (relatively speaking). However, can't you add angular momentum to the target nucleus by instead just shining circularly-polarized light onto it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
gildomar said:
I know that in order to create a high-spin nucleus, that you slam a nucleus into the target nucleus off-center so that when they fuse, it has a large angular momentum (relatively speaking). However, can't you add angular momentum to the target nucleus by instead just shining circularly-polarized light onto it?
As in circularly polarized gamma ray? What energy level is necessary to change the spin of a nucleon, or set of nucleons? Consider that the target is a nucleus, rather than the atom (atomic electrons).

http://www.physik.fu-berlin.de/einrichtungen/ag/ag-heyn/Teaching/docs/vorlesung_12_1_10.pdf
 
Last edited by a moderator:
gildomar said:
I know that in order to create a high-spin nucleus, that you slam a nucleus into the target nucleus off-center so that when they fuse, it has a large angular momentum (relatively speaking).
Well, it is not possible to focus beams with that precision. You get all sorts of collisions, some of them are off-center.

However, can't you add angular momentum to the target nucleus by instead just shining circularly-polarized light onto it?
If you hit the right frequency for a transition, I would expect that this is possible, at least in theory.
 
@Astronuc - I figure that it would need to be a gamma ray, but I'm not sure, since from what I gather, finding the proper energy for a rotationally excited state is rather complicated due to the issues you mentioned. But it might be possible with a fair amount of number-crunching.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

@mfb - I kind of figured that bit about the off-center collisions, since bunches of particles are used in beams anyway. Not to mention while the focusing magnets are pretty good, I didn't think that they can focus something the size of a nucleus to hit another nucleus precisely, even ignoring Heisenberg uncertainty for a moment.

So you haven't heard of doing it that way before? I haven't been able to find anything like it from research that I've done, but I wouldn't want to be copying someone else's work if they've already done it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
18K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K