In various textbooks like Polchinski and in papers like Witten hep-th/9503124 they go through the process of starting with the bosonic action (in p-form notation) of M Theory and turning it into the action for IIA string theory.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

I understand the process (ie dimensional reduction) which converts one action into another, but I don't understand why looking at just the bosonic part of the action is sufficent, given IIA includes fermions. During the process of compactifying and dimensional reduction the M Theory action splits into various parts, the NS-NS part, the R-R part and the CS part (ie a mixture of NS and R terms). Is it the case that M theory is a purely bosonic theory which then turns into a fermionic one when you reduce to 10 dimensions?

Thanks for any help :)

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Bosonic action in M Theory -> IIA Theory

Loading...

Similar Threads for Bosonic action Theory | Date |
---|---|

B Help me understand Boson stars | Sep 4, 2017 |

A String perturbation equations from Polyakov action | Jul 4, 2017 |

I 5 Higgs-like bosons -- natural supersymmetry required? | Sep 21, 2016 |

I Does bosonic superpartners create new fundamental forces? | Sep 16, 2016 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**