Bound states in propagator

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

A system with a bound state must have its scattering amplitude exhibit a pole in the upper half of the complex wave-number plane. For instance, the scattering amplitude can be expressed as A=\frac{1}{|k|-iB} with B>0, resulting in a pole at k=iB, which leads to a negative energy state E=k^2/2m=-B^2/2m. This negative energy indicates a bound state. Conversely, if B is negative, the pole shifts to k=-i|B|, failing to represent a bound state as it does not satisfy the requirement of having a pole in the upper half-plane, which is essential for ensuring the energy remains negative.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of complex analysis in quantum mechanics
  • Familiarity with scattering theory
  • Knowledge of bound states and their energy characteristics
  • Basic proficiency in wave-number representation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of poles in scattering amplitudes in quantum mechanics
  • Explore the relationship between bound states and negative energy solutions
  • Investigate the role of complex wave-number planes in quantum scattering
  • Learn about the mathematical formulation of scattering amplitudes
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, particularly those specializing in quantum mechanics and scattering theory, as well as students seeking to deepen their understanding of bound states and their implications in quantum systems.

geoduck
Messages
257
Reaction score
2
Why must it be true that a system that has a bound state must have its scattering amplitude have a pole in the upper half of the complex wave-number plane?

For example, if the scattering amplitude as a function of the initial wave number magnitude |k| is:

A=\frac{1}{|k|-iB}
with B>0, then there is a pole at k=iB which implies the energy is:

E=k^2/2m=-B^2/2m

that is, a negative energy or bound state.

But if B is negative, then the pole is at k=-i|B| and the energy would be the same using the same formula, but this doesn't represent a bound state because for some reason the pole must be in the upper-half of the complex plane. Why is this true?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The reason why is that a bound state only exists when the energy of the system is negative, and this can only occur when the pole of the scattering amplitude is in the upper-half of the complex wave-number plane. This is because the energy of the bound state must be less than zero, which implies that the real part of the wave number must be negative. The upper-half of the complex wave-number plane is defined by having a positive imaginary part, so if the pole is in this region then the real part of the wave number will be negative and thus the energy of the system will be negative, resulting in a bound state.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
13K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K