Why must it be true that a system that has a bound state must have its scattering amplitude have a pole in the upper half of the complex wave-number plane?(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

For example, if the scattering amplitude as a function of the initial wave number magnitude |k| is:

[tex]A=\frac{1}{|k|-iB}[/tex]

with B>0, then there is a pole at k=iB which implies the energy is:

E=k^2/2m=-B^2/2m

that is, a negative energy or bound state.

But if B is negative, then the pole is at k=-i|B| and the energy would be the same using the same formula, but this doesn't represent a bound state because for some reason the pole must be in the upper-half of the complex plane. Why is this true?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Bound states in propagator

Can you offer guidance or do you also need help?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

Loading...

Similar Threads - Bound states propagator | Date |
---|---|

I Bound and Stationary States | Feb 8, 2018 |

A Bound states and the energy-momentum relation... | Sep 23, 2017 |

I Constraints on potential for normalizable wavefunction | Apr 10, 2017 |

I Bound states of a periodic potential well in one dimension | Mar 20, 2017 |

Can the 'mass' of bound states show up full propagator? | Jun 12, 2013 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**