Bounding modulus of complex logarithm times complex power function

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on bounding the modulus of the expression ##(\log(z))^j z^\lambda##, where ##j## is a non-negative integer and ##\lambda## is a complex number. It establishes that this modulus can be bounded above by ##c|z|^l## for some integer ##l## and constant ##c##, particularly near the origin where ##|z|>0## is small. Key inequalities derived include ##|(\log(z))^j| \leq \left(\frac{2}{|z|}\right)^j## and ##|z^\lambda| \leq |z|^{\lfloor x\rfloor} e^{\max\{0,-2\pi y\}}##, leading to the conclusion that ##|(\log(z))^j z^\lambda| \leq 2^j e^{\max\{0,-2\pi y\}} |z|^{\lfloor x\rfloor - j}##.

PREREQUISITES
  • Complex analysis, particularly properties of logarithms and exponentials.
  • Understanding of limits and L'Hôpital's rule.
  • Familiarity with inequalities involving logarithmic and exponential functions.
  • Knowledge of complex numbers and their representation in the form ##\lambda = x + iy##.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of complex logarithms and their branches, especially in relation to discontinuities.
  • Learn about the application of L'Hôpital's rule in complex analysis.
  • Investigate the behavior of complex functions near singularities and the origin.
  • Explore bounding techniques in complex analysis, focusing on inequalities involving logarithmic and exponential terms.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, particularly those specializing in complex analysis, researchers dealing with complex functions, and students seeking to understand the behavior of logarithmic expressions in complex domains.

psie
Messages
315
Reaction score
40
TL;DR
In my textbook (Ordinary Differential Equations by Andersson and Böiers), they claim that ##|(\log(z))^jz^\lambda|## can be bounded above by ##c|z|^l## for some integer ##l## and constant ##c##. I have a hard time confirming this.
It is claimed that the modulus of ##(\log(z))^jz^\lambda##, where ##j## is a positive integer (or ##0##) and ##\lambda## a complex number, can be bounded above by ##c|z|^l## for some integer ##l## and constant ##c##. Assume we are on the branch ##0\leq \mathrm{arg}(z)<2\pi## (yes, ##0## included; hence a discontinuous logarithm). Anyway, here's what I've tried so far.

Let ##\lambda_1## and ##\lambda_2## be the real and imaginary part of ##\lambda## respectively. By definition, ##\log(z)=\ln(|z|)+i\mathrm{arg}(z)##. Then $$|(\log(z))^j|=|\log(z)|^j\leq\left(\sqrt{\ln(|z|)^2+4\pi^2}\right)^j,$$ and $$|z^\lambda|=|e^{\lambda\log(z)}|=e^{\lambda_1\ln(|z|)}e^{-\lambda_2\arg(z)}=|z|^{\lambda_1}e^{-\lambda_2\arg(z)}.$$

Then someone has pointed to the limit ##\lim _{x\to \infty }\frac{(\ln x)^r}{x^k}=0## for ##r,k>0##, yet I don't see how we can write my simplification as this limit, if I have understood things right. Maybe there's another approach. Grateful for any help.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you only interested in large values of z or is this supposed to be true near the origin as well?
 
Office_Shredder said:
Are you only interested in large values of z or is this supposed to be true near the origin as well?
I forgot to mention, it's supposed to be true near the origin, so for ##|z|>0## small. I have found a solution elsewhere and I think there's no harm in posting it here. Write ##\lambda=x+iy##. So

\begin{align} |(\log z)^j| &=|\log|z|+i\arg z|^j \nonumber \\ &\le\big(\big|\log|z|\big|+2\pi\big)^j \nonumber \\ &\le\left(\frac{1}{|z|}+2\pi\right)^j \nonumber \\ &\le\left(\frac{2}{|z|}\right)^j \nonumber \end{align}

The first inequality is the triangle inequality, second follows from ##ye^{-y}<1## when ##y=-\log|z|>0## is large and the third one is ##2\pi<\frac{1}{|z|}## for ##|z|## small. Moreover,

\begin{align} |z^\lambda| &=|\exp(\lambda\log z)| \nonumber \\ &=\exp\big(\operatorname{Re}(\lambda\log z)\big) \nonumber \\ &=\exp\big(x\log|z|-y\arg z\big) \nonumber \\ &=|z|^xe^{-y\arg z} \nonumber \\ &\le|z|^{\lfloor x\rfloor}e^{-y\arg z} \nonumber \\ &\le|z|^{\lfloor x\rfloor}e^{\max\{0,-2\pi y\}}. \nonumber \end{align}

Thus, ##|(\log z)^jz^\lambda|\le 2^je^{\max\{0,-2\pi y\}}|z|^{\lfloor x\rfloor-j}##.
 
I guess we can simplify this. If ##|\log(z)| \leq c|z|^n## then ##|\log(z)^j z^\lambda| \leq c^j |z|^{(nj+\lambda)}##. So it suffices to just consider ##\log(z)##.

Ignoring the discontinuity with the branch cut, we can try to just apply l'hospital's rule.

##\lim_{z\to 0} \log(z)/z^n## (with n negative, so you get an infinity over infinity) Taking one derivative gives ##(1/z)/( (nz^{n-1}) = 1/(nz^n)##. So even with ##n=-1## we get that this limit is zero, and hence ##|\log(z)| \leq |z^{-1}|## for small enough ##z##
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: psie
Office_Shredder said:
I guess we can simplify this. If ##|\log(z)| \leq c|z|^n## then ##|\log(z)^j z^\lambda| \leq c^j |z|^{(nj+\lambda)}##.

A little more work to do, since \lambda is complex. \begin{split}<br /> |z^\lambda| &amp;= |e^{\Re(\lambda \ln z)}| \\<br /> &amp;= |z|^{\Re(\lambda)}e^{-\Im(\lambda)\arg z} \end{split} and having chosen your branch you can remove the dependence on \arg z by maximising -\Im(\lambda) \arg(z).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Office_Shredder

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K