Br2, is known to contain two atoms of bromine

  • Thread starter Thread starter physicsss
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Atoms
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the bromine molecule, Br2, which consists of two bromine atoms. Participants analyze mass spectrum data revealing three Br2+ peaks with mass numbers 158, 160, and 162. The conversation highlights the relationship between mass numbers and isotopes, specifically identifying the isotopes of bromine present in nature, namely Br-79 and Br-81, while clarifying that Br-80 does not exist. The participants emphasize the importance of understanding mass numbers and isotopes to solve the problem effectively.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of isotopes and their definitions
  • Familiarity with mass spectrometry principles
  • Knowledge of the periodic table, specifically bromine's atomic number (35)
  • Basic algebra for solving equations related to mass numbers
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the isotopes of bromine and their natural abundance
  • Learn about mass spectrometry and how it measures molecular ions
  • Study the concept of mass number and its significance in nuclear chemistry
  • Explore the relationship between protons, neutrons, and isotopes in atomic structure
USEFUL FOR

Chemistry students, researchers in nuclear chemistry, and professionals in analytical chemistry who are interested in isotopic analysis and mass spectrometry techniques.

physicsss
Messages
319
Reaction score
0
The bromine molecule, Br2, is known to contain two atoms of bromine. A mass spectrum of the moluecular ions formed showned three Br2+ peaks, with mass numbers 158, 160, and 162. Use this information to determine which isotopes of bromine occur in nature.

I have no idea how to do this...any ideas?
 
Last edited:
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Are u sure with the numbers??U said 158,160 & 160. :confused:

Do you know what isotopes are??

Daniel.
 
Oops, changed it. Yes, I know what isotopes are. (different in number of neureons, but same number of protons)
 
I assert that with the data given,u cannot determine the number of protons in the nucleus...Therefore,i cannot see a way to solve the problem...

Daniel.

P.S.U have the three mass numbers,if u are allowed to use the table of elements,u can find the numbers you're interested in quite easily...Then why would they give you the info with Br2+??Since when Br forms compounds at valence 2??
 
Dexter, that's Br_2^+ ions that are being measured by the spectrometer. The way a mass spectrometer works is that it measures deflection by some known applied field.

Physicsss: Look up a Periodic table (no other way). The atomic number of Br is 35. Then you know how many protons there are in the molecule. From here, you can handle it. Assume that both atoms in one molecule are identical isotopes.

(I'm not certain if this is a valid assumption, but the lack of any odd mass numbers suggests it is okay.)
 
I'm still unsure on how to do this problem...can you give me some hints?
 
From the information given, you have the mass numbers ( total number of nucleons )
From the periodic table , you have the number of protons. So, since you know that all three have the same number of protons, you can determine the number of nutrons.
 
what would the number of neutrons they each have tell me?
 
Last edited:
Physicsss,what is the definition of mass number ?
 
  • #10
You are finding the mass of 2 atoms in a diatomic Br molecule.

So what combination of N1 and N2 will give 158, 160 or 162.

Well the lowest 158 has to be 2*N1, then the heaviest mass 162 = 2*N2, and that leaves the other possibility that N1+N2=160.
 
  • #11
Mass number is the number of protons plus the number of neutrons...

To Astronuc: I don't quite understand what you're trying to say...
 
Last edited:
  • #12
Astronuc,there are 4 posibilities,not 3:
79+79;79+81;81+81;80+80

Okay??

Daniel.
 
  • #13
No Dexter, there are only 3 : those which Astronuc suggested.

80-80 is not a possibility, because then one would also expect spectral lines for 159 and 161.
 
  • #14
Gokul43201 said:
No Dexter, there are only 3 : those which Astronuc suggested.

80-80 is not a possibility, because then one would also expect spectral lines for 159 and 161.

Who said there weren't spectral lines for 159 and 161?Did u read carefully the text of the problem...?? :wink:

physicsss said:
The bromine molecule, Br2, is known to contain two atoms of bromine. A mass spectrum of the moluecular ions formed showned three Br2+ peaks, with mass numbers 158, 160, and 162. Use this information to determine which isotopes of bromine occur in nature.


Now,if u haven't seen the computer generated graph/curve which would return zero for 159 & 161 (namely for isotope 80),then u cannot tell whether it exists or not.

In this case,it doesn't.The isotope 80 doesn't exist in nature ,as one could learn from
here
,but only judging the text of the problem & the key-word "peak",you (actunally i) could be mislead to erroneous conclusions...

Bad wording from the problem's inventor...


Daniel.
 
  • #15
And BTW,who said that radioisotopes could not form a covalent bond?Incidentally,the halflife for the "tricky no.80" is of the order of 17minutes,but other isotopes would not half themselves in days...

Reference:
HERE

Daniel.
 
  • #16
I'm afraid all this is only likely to confuse the OP more.

physicsss : Each molecule has 2 atoms. Each atom may be anyone of the possible isotopes. For some molecule, the Mass of the molecule is M = M1 + M2, the sum of the atomic masses (or mass numbers) = P + N1 + P + N2 = 2P + N1 + N2. Similarly, for another molecules, M' = 2P + N1' + N2' and M" = 2P + N1" + N2", where P is the number of protons (fixed), and Ns are the number of neutrons in the two atoms (which may be the same or different).

Substituting the given numbers (and using the number of protons from the atomic number), you will get 3 equations. Write these down, and we'll show you what to do next.
 
Last edited:
  • #17
2*35+2*N=158, where N=44
2*35+2*N=160, where N=45
2*35+2*N=162, where N=46

is that right?
 
  • #18
Hmm...after some thinking...I came up with the following:
70+N1+N2=158
70+N1+N2=160
70+N1+N2=162

am i on the right track?
 
  • #19
If you change your notation,then,yes..

Daniel.
 
  • #20
how do you mean?
 
  • #21
70+N1+N2=158
70+N1'+N2'=160
70+N1"+N2"=162

But all these 6 variables need not be different. In fact, if there are only two different number, you can see that you can make 3 different sums from them. Let the numbers be a, b. Then the different sums will be a+a, a+b and b+b, or 2a, a+b and 2b.

Try these in the above equations, and if you get the combination right, they will work.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
583
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
13K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K