MHB Break-Even Point: Manufacturing Company Analysis

  • Thread starter Thread starter Victoriaa
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Point
AI Thread Summary
A manufacturing company is evaluating a new product's feasibility, with a production capacity of 800 units per month at a cost of $50 per unit and fixed costs of $22,400. The break-even point is determined to be 70% of capacity, requiring the sale of 560 units. At 90% capacity, the projected net income is $6,400, while a decline to 55% capacity results in a net loss of $4,800. To achieve a net income of $9,000, unit sales must reach 785, and sales of 510 units would lead to a loss of $2,000. Understanding these financial metrics is crucial for the company's decision-making process.
Victoriaa
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
A manufacturing company is studying the feasibility of producing a new product. A new production line could manufacture up to 800 units per month at a cost of \$50 per unit. Fixed costs would be \$22,400 per month. Variable selling and shipping costs are estimated to be \$20 per unit. Market research indicates that a unit price of \$110 would be competitive.
a) What is the break-even point as a percent of capacity?
b) What would be the net income at 90% of capacity?
c) What would unit sales have to be to attain a net income of \$9000 per month?
d) In a serious recession sales might fall to 55% of capacity. What would be the
resulting net income?
e) What dollar amount of sales would result in a loss of \$2000 per month?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello and welcome to MHB, Victoriaa! :D

In order for us to best help you, we need to know what you have tried so we can see where exactly you are having trouble. This is why we ask people to show effort.

But, having said that, in order to answer the questions, we need to figure out some functions, namely revenue, cost, and profit all defined on a monthly basis. Let's let $x$ be the number of units manufactured and sold during a given month.

And so revenue $R$ would be the product of the number of units sold and the price per unit (which we are told is \$110):

$$R(x)=110x$$

The cost function we obtain from the given information as follows:

$$C(x)=50x+22400+20x=70x+22400=70(x+320)$$

Profit, or net income, is defined as revenue minus cost, hence:

$$P(x)=110x-(70x+22400)=40x-22400=40(x-560)$$

a) The break-even point is where profit is 0, so what you need to do here is set $P(x)=0$ and solve for $x$. Then take the value you find for $x$ and divide it bt the capacity of 800 units to find what portion of capacity this $x$ is and then multiply by 100 to convert to a percentage. You could simply divide $x$ by 8 to get the percentage in one step:

$$\frac{x}{800}\cdot100=\frac{x}{8}$$

What do you find?
 
a) Setting $P(x)=0$, we have:

$$40(x-560)=0\implies x=560$$

And so the percentage of capacity at the break-even point is then:

$$\frac{560}{8}=70$$

So, we conclude that in order to break even, production must be at 70% of capacity.

b) What would be the net income at 90% of capacity?

90% of capacity is:

$$\frac{9}{10}\cdot800=720$$

And so the net income (profit) (in dollars) at this production level is:

$$P(720)=40(720-560)=3200(9-7)=6400$$

c) What would unit sales have to be to attain a net income of \$9000 per month?

$$P(x)=40x-22400=9000$$

$$40x=31400$$

$$x=785$$

d) In a serious recession sales might fall to 55% of capacity. What would be the resulting net income?

$$\frac{11}{20}\cdot800=440$$

$$P(440)=40(440-560)=1600(11-14)=-4800$$

At a product level of 55%, their would be a net loss of \$4800.

e) What dollar amount of sales would result in a loss of \$2000 per month?

First we need to find the unit sales for a loss of \$2000:

$$P(x)=40x-22400=-2000$$

$$40x=20400$$

$$x=510$$

And so the revenue at this level (in dollars) is:

$$R(510)=110(510)=56100$$
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Back
Top