The discussion revolves around the firing of Captain Brett Crozier from the USS Theodore Roosevelt amid the COVID-19 outbreak on the ship. Participants explore the implications of his actions, the terminology used in military contexts regarding his removal, and the broader consequences of his decision to publicize concerns about the health of his crew. The conversation touches on themes of military conduct, whistleblowing, and leadership responsibilities.
Participants express a range of views, with no clear consensus on the appropriateness of Crozier's actions or the motivations behind his removal. Disagreements persist regarding the implications of his letter and the responsibilities of military leadership.
Some discussions highlight the lack of clarity regarding the chain of command and the potential consequences of Crozier's actions, including the impact on his career and the health of the crew. The conversation reflects varying interpretations of military protocol and the nature of whistleblowing.
If someone is removed from military service, we use 'discharged', rather than 'fired'. In the case of a commissioned officer, his commission could be revoked, but that would be unusual. It might impair the President's authority to recall him to service.kent davidge said:
Yes,media beat up! Most likely just demoted or shifted sideways to a nice quiet office jobkent davidge said:
You must not be keeping up with the news. The Navy has recommended reinstating him to his position.LT Judd said:
Why? Do you have a link?Vanadium 50 said:
phinds said:
Vanadium 50 said:
phinds said:
