Bringing wind energy to the ground through a giant pitot tube

In summary, the idea proposed is to use a parachute attached to a flag pole with a hole in the center connected to a plastic tube that leads to a turbine on the ground. The wind passing through the chute would create a low pressure region behind it, causing the turbine to spin and generate energy. However, there are concerns about practicality and the effectiveness of this method due to the small pressure difference and the need for maintenance and repairs.
  • #1
steamdreamer
6
0
Ok not a great title, but let me try to explain the idea.
Imagine that you have say a parachute attached to the top of a flag pole. In the center of the parachute a hole is cut and connected to a plastic tube that goes to the ground. When the wind comes up the parachute exerts a drag on the air and this tube connects the low pressure backside of chute to the ground. At the ground level inside the tube is a turbine that will spin as a result of the suction created. To enhance the energy transfer there will be a tube concentrically centered around the low pressure tube that transmits the high pressure air to the underside of the turbine on the ground. Essentially its a giant pitot tube with the parachute acting as a flow obstructor, the two line then transmit differential pressure to the ground. So would it an effective way to transfer wind energy?

The pros would be that you could bring all maintenance to a ground level, and eliminate gigantic tower weights and costs.

I am not certain how to proced modeling or thinking numerically about such an idea. Any ideas?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #2
I can't quite visualize this. I don't see where the low pressure is.

The pros would be that you could bring all maintenance to a ground level, and eliminate gigantic tower weights and costs.

You still need a tower for the parachute, and a plastic tube and a fragile parachute which will need to be repaired. The tube needs to be fairly large because the turbine won't spin unless there is a lot of air moving through it.
 
  • #3
I've attached a very poor sketch of what I'm thinking. The low pressure region should be behind the parachute since it is blocked off from wind flow.
 

Attachments

  • Wind Pitot Tube.jpg
    Wind Pitot Tube.jpg
    9.8 KB · Views: 611
  • #4
There isn't much pressure behind the wind so there would be an awful lot of loss.
 
  • #5
Ignoring the practical details of building it, a basic problem with your thinking is that there is no "pressure drop" behind the HOLE in the parachute where your tube is.

Yes there is a pressure difference between the front and back of the rest of the chute, but even that is a very small pressure. Think about the size of an "old style" circular parachute that is needed to support a 200lb person doing a parachute jump. The pressure difference across the chute is probably less than 1 psi. That is not enough to generate an useful amount of energy.
 

What is a giant pitot tube?

A giant pitot tube is a large structure that uses the principle of a pitot tube to harness wind energy. It consists of a long, narrow tube with a small opening at one end and a larger opening at the other. The wind passing through the tube creates a pressure difference which can be converted into mechanical energy.

How does a giant pitot tube bring wind energy to the ground?

The giant pitot tube uses a series of rotors and generators to convert the mechanical energy from the wind into electricity. The electricity is then transferred to the ground through cables and can be used to power homes and businesses.

What are the benefits of using a giant pitot tube for wind energy?

One of the main benefits of using a giant pitot tube is that it can harness wind energy at higher altitudes where the wind is stronger and more consistent. This allows for greater energy production compared to traditional wind turbines. Additionally, the structure of the pitot tube can be designed to be more visually appealing and less disruptive to the surrounding landscape.

What are the potential drawbacks of using a giant pitot tube?

One potential drawback is the cost of constructing and maintaining a giant pitot tube. The materials and technology required for such a structure can be expensive. Additionally, there may be concerns about the structural integrity of the pitot tube in extreme weather conditions.

Are there any existing examples of giant pitot tubes for wind energy?

While there are currently no operational giant pitot tubes, there have been several prototypes and designs proposed in recent years. One notable example is the "Vortex Bladeless" design, which uses a series of oscillating rods to harness wind energy. However, more research and development is needed before giant pitot tubes become a widely used method for wind energy production.

Similar threads

  • General Engineering
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
49
Views
3K
  • General Engineering
Replies
16
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • General Engineering
Replies
19
Views
10K
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • General Discussion
Replies
4
Views
7K
  • Aerospace Engineering
Replies
2
Views
7K
Back
Top