Broken record political promises in the Maine primary.

  • Context: News 
  • Thread starter Thread starter turbo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Broken
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion critiques the GOP candidates for governor in Maine, highlighting their repetitive promises of job creation, tax cuts, and reduced spending without substantive plans. Candidates like Wes Otten claim to have created jobs but are criticized for their past business failures and lack of transparency regarding "wasteful spending." The discussion emphasizes that genuine job creation relies on infrastructure development and that tax cuts during economic downturns are detrimental. The consensus is that effective job creation stems from addressing real economic needs rather than vague promises.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of economic principles related to job creation
  • Familiarity with tax policy impacts on business
  • Knowledge of infrastructure development's role in economic growth
  • Awareness of social welfare programs and their funding
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the impact of tax cuts on job creation during economic recessions
  • Explore case studies on infrastructure development and its correlation with job growth
  • Investigate the effectiveness of social welfare programs in stimulating local economies
  • Analyze the historical context of GOP tax policies and their outcomes
USEFUL FOR

Political analysts, economists, voters interested in Maine's gubernatorial race, and anyone examining the implications of tax policy on job creation and economic stability.

turbo
Insights Author
Gold Member
Messages
3,181
Reaction score
57
Every single GOP candidate for governor (Primary is next Tuesday) is saying the same things. "I will create jobs, I will cut taxes, and I will cut wasteful spending." It all sounds so rosy, but how can a governor create jobs? Most of them, if pressed, will say that they will create jobs by cutting taxes on businesses (the failed Reagan-Bushes model). Everybody is for lower taxes (their own!), but the GOP in this state, like in DC, seems to think that the smart thing to do is to cut taxes for the people most able to pay them - the wealthy and businesses. And "wasteful spending"? What is that? Head-start, food stamps, funding for welfare-to-work training programs? There is never any explanation for what is "wasteful spending" but you can bet that it won't include cutting any corporate-welfare initiatives - the centerpiece of the "I will create jobs" claim.

Perhaps the most irritating ads are for Wes Otten. He claims to have created "1200 jobs" and says he will do the same for our state if elected. As the head of American Skiing, he "created" seasonal jobs (you don't need a lot of snow-makers or lift-attendants for most of the year, here) and made himself a tidy personal fortune while leaving stock-holders with worthless paper as he ran the company into heavy debt. Anybody who invested with that snake-oil salesman in the past should have plenty of incentive not to vote for him in the primaries.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The rudimentary framework for job creation and growth is infrastructure development and spending. This principle is found ubiquitously in any and all economic regions. "Wasteful spending" is a fuzzy euphemism for social benefits, which are inherently troublesome during times of recession.

That said, I agree that the philosophy of reduced taxation during a contractionary period is pure malfeasance. If you want to get out of this mess, tax, tax, tax.
 
I've never understood most of the claims about creating jobs. Jobs are typically created out of necessity (everyday items and services we all need), and boredom (something that people who have the money can spend it on to relieve their boredom like movies and entertainment fo instance). In tougher economic times the frills go away and so do the jobs that support those frills. a lot of jobs that support the necessary goods and services have gone across the pond over the years. So what kind of jobs are left for Americans to do in tough economic times when people are spending less on unecessary services?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 134 ·
5
Replies
134
Views
18K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
9K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 71 ·
3
Replies
71
Views
10K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K