Buckyball Interference, classical/quantum border?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Q_Goest
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Interference
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Markus Arndt's 1999 experiment demonstrated quantum interference using single C60 buckyballs fired at a diffraction grating. As the firing rate increases to 220,000 molecules per second, the spacing between molecules decreases, leading to potential interactions that may disrupt the quantum interference pattern. The discussion raises the question of whether closely packed buckyballs would behave classically, resulting in the disappearance of the diffraction pattern, similar to how air molecules behave when directed at a grating. The interaction dynamics of the molecules are crucial in determining the transition from quantum to classical behavior.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles, particularly wave-particle duality.
  • Familiarity with diffraction grating and its role in observing interference patterns.
  • Knowledge of molecular dynamics and interactions, specifically regarding C60 buckyballs.
  • Basic grasp of decoherence and its implications in quantum physics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Investigate the effects of molecular density on quantum interference patterns in experiments.
  • Explore the concept of decoherence in quantum systems and its impact on interference.
  • Learn about experimental setups for testing quantum-classical transitions using C60 molecules.
  • Research the principles of wave-particle duality and its experimental validations.
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, quantum mechanics researchers, and students interested in the behavior of quantum particles and the implications of molecular interactions on interference patterns.

Q_Goest
Science Advisor
Messages
3,013
Reaction score
42
In '99, Markus Arndt published his paper in which single buckyballs (primarily C60 molecules) were fired at a diffraction grating and quantum interference was found. Arndt's experiment used single molecules that had a velocity of roughly 220 meters per second. The molecules traveled roughly 1 meter to the target.

Now imagine that the rate at which these molecules were fired at the diffraction grating was slowly increased such that instead of just one molecule being in the apparatus at a time, 2, then 3, then many more would actually be moving through the apparatus at any moment. For example, if the molecules were shot out at a rate of 220,000 moelcules per second, the molecules would be 1 mm apart and there would be roughly 1000 molecules transiting through the apparatus at once. One could then imaging even closer spacing between molecules, spacing so close, the molecules might even begin interacting.

At some point, I would think the molecules would be so close that they would interact with each other and/or you might even be able to see a thin stream of them. As the molecules got closer and closer together, is there a possibility that they would stop behaving as quantum particles and start acting like classical particles (ie: the diffraction pattern would disappear)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Q_Goest said:
At some point, I would think the molecules would be so close that they would interact with each other and/or you might even be able to see a thin stream of them. As the molecules got closer and closer together, is there a possibility that they would stop behaving as quantum particles and start acting like classical particles (ie: the diffraction pattern would disappear)?

Why would you think so ? After all, you can have light show interference without having it to be "counted as photons" but where you can "see a thin stream of light".

Of course, it might be that the specific interaction of the buckyballs makes them decohere, or makes the interference not work in the same way as without it, but I wouldn't consider that as some kind of indication of a "quantum-classical" transition. Just that the experimental setup which was conceived for individual buckyballs is now perturbed by an extra interaction that wasn't initially taken into account (and was negligible).
 
Hi vanesch,
I'm assuming, perhaps incorrectly, that when these molecules interact, either with other molecules or something in the environment, the interference pattern will disappear. Take for example, an expanding cloud or thick stream of molecules. I wouldn't expect gasses such as air for example, to produce an interference pattern. I'd expect air molecules to act as classical particles if they are directed at a diffraction grating. That is, if an air hose is used to direct air at a diffraction grating, one would detect two, independent jets as opposed to an interference pattern because they are constantly bumping into one another as they traverse the distance from the air hose, through the diffraction grating, to some point of detection.

Similarly, I'd expect C60 molecules would do the same thing as we increase the density of the stream. We could increase that stream density by only increasing the rate as if the molecules were in a single file, or we could increase also the breadth of the stream so it's more like shooting molecules from an air hose.

Thanks for any help in trying to understand this... Luckily I'll never be taking a final exam on any of this - it's too late for me!
 
Q_Goest said:
I'd expect air molecules to act as classical particles if they are directed at a diffraction grating. That is, if an air hose is used to direct air at a diffraction grating, one would detect two, independent jets as opposed to an interference pattern because they are constantly bumping into one another as they traverse the distance from the air hose, through the diffraction grating, to some point of detection.

Actually, if the air molecules are still bumping into one another before, "during" and a bit after they pass a grating, then I'd expect them not even to show up as two jets! If their interaction is so strong as to be able to change significantly their "trajectory", there's no point in expecting two separated jets afterwards either, but only some bump.

It might of course be that there is a level of interaction which can blur already the expected single-particle interference pattern, without completely blurring the two-jet picture.
 
vanesch said:
It might of course be that there is a level of interaction which can blur already the expected single-particle interference pattern, without completely blurring the two-jet picture.
Thanks vanesch. Yes, that's really what I'm wondering. It almost seems like an easy experiment to do, just increase the number of molecules being sent through the experimental apparatus till we see the interference pattern begin to disappear.

But I'd assume there is some ability to predict under what conditions that 'blur' should occur. Maybe not so easy?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K