Buckyball Interference, classical/quantum border?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Q_Goest
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Interference
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the behavior of buckyballs (C60 molecules) in relation to quantum interference when subjected to varying densities in an experimental setup involving a diffraction grating. Participants explore the transition between quantum and classical behavior as the density of molecules increases, considering both theoretical implications and experimental observations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that as the density of buckyballs increases, interactions between molecules could lead to a loss of the quantum interference pattern, suggesting a transition to classical behavior.
  • Others argue that interference can occur without the need for individual particles to be counted, citing light as an example where interference is observed despite the presence of a continuous stream.
  • A participant questions the assumption that interactions will necessarily lead to the disappearance of the interference pattern, suggesting that the specific nature of interactions might not indicate a clear quantum-classical transition.
  • Concerns are raised about the effects of environmental interactions, such as air molecules, on the expected outcomes of the experiment, with some suggesting that strong interactions could obscure both interference patterns and distinct particle jets.
  • There is speculation about the possibility of predicting the conditions under which interference patterns might begin to blur as density increases, though this is acknowledged as potentially complex.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on whether increasing density will lead to a definitive transition from quantum to classical behavior, with no consensus reached on the implications of interactions between molecules.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include assumptions about the nature of interactions between molecules and the environmental factors that may influence the outcomes of the proposed experiments. The discussion does not resolve the complexities involved in predicting the behavior of the system as density varies.

Q_Goest
Science Advisor
Messages
3,014
Reaction score
42
In '99, Markus Arndt published his paper in which single buckyballs (primarily C60 molecules) were fired at a diffraction grating and quantum interference was found. Arndt's experiment used single molecules that had a velocity of roughly 220 meters per second. The molecules traveled roughly 1 meter to the target.

Now imagine that the rate at which these molecules were fired at the diffraction grating was slowly increased such that instead of just one molecule being in the apparatus at a time, 2, then 3, then many more would actually be moving through the apparatus at any moment. For example, if the molecules were shot out at a rate of 220,000 moelcules per second, the molecules would be 1 mm apart and there would be roughly 1000 molecules transiting through the apparatus at once. One could then imaging even closer spacing between molecules, spacing so close, the molecules might even begin interacting.

At some point, I would think the molecules would be so close that they would interact with each other and/or you might even be able to see a thin stream of them. As the molecules got closer and closer together, is there a possibility that they would stop behaving as quantum particles and start acting like classical particles (ie: the diffraction pattern would disappear)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Q_Goest said:
At some point, I would think the molecules would be so close that they would interact with each other and/or you might even be able to see a thin stream of them. As the molecules got closer and closer together, is there a possibility that they would stop behaving as quantum particles and start acting like classical particles (ie: the diffraction pattern would disappear)?

Why would you think so ? After all, you can have light show interference without having it to be "counted as photons" but where you can "see a thin stream of light".

Of course, it might be that the specific interaction of the buckyballs makes them decohere, or makes the interference not work in the same way as without it, but I wouldn't consider that as some kind of indication of a "quantum-classical" transition. Just that the experimental setup which was conceived for individual buckyballs is now perturbed by an extra interaction that wasn't initially taken into account (and was negligible).
 
Hi vanesch,
I'm assuming, perhaps incorrectly, that when these molecules interact, either with other molecules or something in the environment, the interference pattern will disappear. Take for example, an expanding cloud or thick stream of molecules. I wouldn't expect gasses such as air for example, to produce an interference pattern. I'd expect air molecules to act as classical particles if they are directed at a diffraction grating. That is, if an air hose is used to direct air at a diffraction grating, one would detect two, independent jets as opposed to an interference pattern because they are constantly bumping into one another as they traverse the distance from the air hose, through the diffraction grating, to some point of detection.

Similarly, I'd expect C60 molecules would do the same thing as we increase the density of the stream. We could increase that stream density by only increasing the rate as if the molecules were in a single file, or we could increase also the breadth of the stream so it's more like shooting molecules from an air hose.

Thanks for any help in trying to understand this... Luckily I'll never be taking a final exam on any of this - it's too late for me!
 
Q_Goest said:
I'd expect air molecules to act as classical particles if they are directed at a diffraction grating. That is, if an air hose is used to direct air at a diffraction grating, one would detect two, independent jets as opposed to an interference pattern because they are constantly bumping into one another as they traverse the distance from the air hose, through the diffraction grating, to some point of detection.

Actually, if the air molecules are still bumping into one another before, "during" and a bit after they pass a grating, then I'd expect them not even to show up as two jets! If their interaction is so strong as to be able to change significantly their "trajectory", there's no point in expecting two separated jets afterwards either, but only some bump.

It might of course be that there is a level of interaction which can blur already the expected single-particle interference pattern, without completely blurring the two-jet picture.
 
vanesch said:
It might of course be that there is a level of interaction which can blur already the expected single-particle interference pattern, without completely blurring the two-jet picture.
Thanks vanesch. Yes, that's really what I'm wondering. It almost seems like an easy experiment to do, just increase the number of molecules being sent through the experimental apparatus till we see the interference pattern begin to disappear.

But I'd assume there is some ability to predict under what conditions that 'blur' should occur. Maybe not so easy?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K