Bullet acceleration into moist clay

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the acceleration of a bullet embedding into moist clay, initially moving at 367 m/s and penetrating 0.0621 m. The correct acceleration is determined using the formula Vf² = Vi² + 2ad, yielding -1.08 x 10⁻⁶ m/s². A flawed approach using average velocity resulted in an incorrect acceleration of -5017.3 m/s² due to substituting average velocity for initial velocity. The key takeaway is the importance of using the correct initial conditions in kinematic equations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of kinematic equations in physics
  • Familiarity with concepts of initial and final velocity
  • Basic knowledge of acceleration and its calculation
  • Ability to perform unit conversions and handle significant figures
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the derivation and application of kinematic equations
  • Study the differences between average velocity and initial velocity in motion problems
  • Explore real-world applications of bullet penetration dynamics
  • Learn about the effects of material properties on projectile motion
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and professionals in ballistics or materials science who are interested in understanding projectile motion and the effects of different materials on penetration dynamics.

thehitchcocks
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
The problem:
A bullet is moving at a speed of 367 m/s when it embeds into a lump of moist clay. The bullet penetrates for a distance of 0.0621m. Determine the acceleration of the bullet while moving into the clay.


I can get the correct answer by using Vf2 = Vi2 + 2ad (result: -1.08*10-6 m/s2).

However, I'm trying to understand why an approach using the average velocity doesn't work (that's what I tried first). Can you help me understand what's wrong with the following approach? :

Vavg = (Vi + Vf)/2 = 183.5 m/s

t = d/v
t = 0.0621m / (183.5 m/s) = 0.00034s

d = Vit + 1/2at2
0.0621m = 183.5 m/s * 0.00034s + 1/2a(0.00034s)2
a = -5017.3 m/s2

(you can double-check my math, but I don't believe that's the issue).

So, my specific question: this approach clearly doesn't yield the correct answer - there's something wrong with my thinking here. What specifically is wrong with it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your math was wrong.
thehitchcocks said:
The problem:
A bullet is moving at a speed of 367 m/s when it embeds into a lump of moist clay. The bullet penetrates for a distance of 0.0621m. Determine the acceleration of the bullet while moving into the clay.


I can get the correct answer by using Vf2 = Vi2 + 2ad (result: -1.08*10-6 m/s2).

However, I'm trying to understand why an approach using the average velocity doesn't work (that's what I tried first). Can you help me understand what's wrong with the following approach? :

Vavg = (Vi + Vf)/2 = 183.5 m/s

t = d/v
t = 0.0621m / (183.5 m/s) = 0.00034s

d = Vit + 1/2at2
0.0621m = 183.5 m/s * 0.00034s + 1/2a(0.00034s)2

a = -5017.3 m/s2

(you can double-check my math, but I don't believe that's the issue).

So, my specific question: this approach clearly doesn't yield the correct answer - there's something wrong with my thinking here. What specifically is wrong with it?

You use Vavg where you should use Vi.
Also, you have a negative exponent on what you call the correct answer.
 
You plugged in average velocity instead of initial velocity.

If you don't mind my saying, I don't see any maths in your post: just lots of numbers. Part of the reason you made this mistake is that one number looks very like another and as soon as you plug in the numbers, you lose sight of the maths and physics.
 
thehitchcocks said:
0.0621m = 183.5 m/s * 0.00034s + 1/2a(0.00034s)2
Hi thehitchcocks:

The term 183.5 m/s is not Vi. It is 1/2 Vi.

Regards,
Buzz
 
Thanks for all the replies! Super helpful. We understand now - we got ourselves wrapped up mistakenly in average velocity, when all we needed was initial velocity. Using initial velocity yields the correct answer.

@RUber: Yes, the negative exponent was a typo - sorry about that, our first post ever here, and I didn't catch the error amidst all the markup :( Thanks also for coming back and updating your original response, re: the relationship between our answer and the correct answer.
 

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K