News Bush set to relax rules protecting species

  • Thread starter Thread starter Evo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rules Set
Click For Summary
The discussion centers around the Bush administration's imminent changes to the Endangered Species Act, which could diminish protections for endangered plants and animals. The new regulations would allow federal agencies to assess their own projects' impacts on endangered species without mandatory input from wildlife scientists, a move criticized for potentially weakening conservation efforts. The urgency to finalize these rules before President-elect Obama takes office has raised concerns among lawmakers and environmentalists, who argue that the changes disregard scientific input and could lead to further environmental degradation. Participants express frustration over the administration's perceived disregard for science and the implications for species conservation, emphasizing the interconnectedness of ecosystems and the potential consequences of species extinction. The discussion also touches on the broader implications of these regulatory changes, including the exclusion of global warming considerations in environmental assessments. Overall, there is a strong sentiment that these last-minute regulatory changes are politically motivated and detrimental to environmental protection efforts.
  • #31
chemisttree said:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/11/20/AR2008112003465.html

Apparently the new rule is written to prevent the global warming nuts from devastating our economy by forcing us to curb greenhouse gas emissions because some polar bear has less ice to walk on...

Actually these rules can likely be set aside by the next Congress.

As to ruining the economy, the Republicans have plenty of experience with that it seems. I guess they don't want others to horn in on their specialty?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Even better, the rule states that the agency is not required to consult (it doesn't forbid it) and refers to the effects manifested only through global processes. Pretty much a direct reference to global warming being specifically excluded.

The rule states: "Federal agencies are not required to consult on an action when . . . the effects of such action are manifested only through global processes and (i) cannot be reliably predicted or measured at the local scale, or (ii) would result at most in an extremely small, insignificant local impact, or (iii) are such that the potential risk of harm to species or habitat are remote."
 
  • #33
chemisttree said:
Even better, the rule states that the agency is not required to consult (it doesn't forbid it) and refers to the effects manifested only through global processes. Pretty much a direct reference to global warming being specifically excluded.

Not to worry. These kind of fascist maneuvers by the Bush-Cheney team in the last spasms of exercising their vindictive power will likely be rooted out.

Change is coming. And the stale air in Washington is being sent on its way to the bridge to nowhere.

I suspect that in the end these kinds of thing are at heart merely posturing and playing to their dwindling base.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
18K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K