Bush set to relax rules protecting species

  • Context: News 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Evo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rules Set
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Bush administration is finalizing changes to the Endangered Species Act that will eliminate the requirement for independent scientific reviews by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service or the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration for federal projects affecting protected species. This regulation, set to be published before President-elect Obama takes office, allows federal agencies to self-determine the impact of their projects on endangered species without expert input. Critics argue that this will weaken conservation efforts and lead to further environmental degradation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Endangered Species Act
  • Knowledge of federal environmental regulations
  • Familiarity with ecological principles and species preservation
  • Awareness of the impact of climate change on biodiversity
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of the Endangered Species Act changes on biodiversity
  • Examine case studies on the impact of federal projects on endangered species
  • Learn about ecological interdependencies and keystone species
  • Investigate the role of scientific review in environmental policy
USEFUL FOR

Environmental activists, policymakers, ecologists, and anyone interested in the intersection of government regulations and species conservation.

  • #31
chemisttree said:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/11/20/AR2008112003465.html

Apparently the new rule is written to prevent the global warming nuts from devastating our economy by forcing us to curb greenhouse gas emissions because some polar bear has less ice to walk on...

Actually these rules can likely be set aside by the next Congress.

As to ruining the economy, the Republicans have plenty of experience with that it seems. I guess they don't want others to horn in on their specialty?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Even better, the rule states that the agency is not required to consult (it doesn't forbid it) and refers to the effects manifested only through global processes. Pretty much a direct reference to global warming being specifically excluded.

The rule states: "Federal agencies are not required to consult on an action when . . . the effects of such action are manifested only through global processes and (i) cannot be reliably predicted or measured at the local scale, or (ii) would result at most in an extremely small, insignificant local impact, or (iii) are such that the potential risk of harm to species or habitat are remote."
 
  • #33
chemisttree said:
Even better, the rule states that the agency is not required to consult (it doesn't forbid it) and refers to the effects manifested only through global processes. Pretty much a direct reference to global warming being specifically excluded.

Not to worry. These kind of fascist maneuvers by the Bush-Cheney team in the last spasms of exercising their vindictive power will likely be rooted out.

Change is coming. And the stale air in Washington is being sent on its way to the bridge to nowhere.

I suspect that in the end these kinds of thing are at heart merely posturing and playing to their dwindling base.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
18K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K