C-G coefficients and Angular momentum

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the calculation of Clebsch-Gordan (C-G) coefficients in the context of angular momentum addition. It details the mathematical formulation for combining angular momentum states, specifically using the notation |j, m⟩ and the conditions for total angular momentum conservation. The participants clarify how to derive the coefficients a and b in the linear combinations of states, emphasizing the importance of the triangle inequality and the additive property of the z-component of angular momentum. The conversation concludes with a method to determine the coefficients through orthogonality and normalization constraints.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of angular momentum in quantum mechanics
  • Familiarity with Clebsch-Gordan coefficients
  • Knowledge of quantum state notation |j, m⟩
  • Proficiency in using lowering operators in quantum mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of Clebsch-Gordan coefficients in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about the application of lowering operators in angular momentum calculations
  • Explore the triangle inequality in the context of angular momentum coupling
  • Investigate the orthogonality conditions for quantum states
USEFUL FOR

Quantum physicists, students of quantum mechanics, and researchers working on angular momentum theory will benefit from this discussion.

QuarkDecay
Messages
43
Reaction score
2
Can someone explain to me how we find it?
Examples

Y10X-=
= |1,0>|1/2,-1/2> = √2/3 |3/2,-1/2> + √1/3|1/2,-1/2>

Y11X-=
= |1,1>|1/2,-1/2> = √1/3|3/2,1/2> + √2/3|1/2,1/2>

Y2-1X- =
= √4/5 | 5/2, -3/2> + √1/5 | 3/2, -3/2>

I understand it goes like YlmX± = |l,m>|s,ms> = a |jmax, ?> + b |jmin, ?> and a,b is from the (C-G) coefficients, but I can't find how the ? comes up. I thought it was m-ms or ms-m but it doesn't match all of the examples.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When you add angular momenta, say ##l## and ##s## so that ##\vec l+\vec s = \vec j##, you have terms like ##| l, m_l\rangle |s, m_s\rangle## that you want to write as a linear combination of the ## |j, m_j\rangle## states. First note that the terms that appear in the linear combination may have all the values of ##j## that satisfy the triangle inequality, i.e. ##j_{min} \leq j \leq j_{max}##, not just the two extremal values. Also, the component of the total angular momentum along the quantization axis must be conserved, i.e. ##m_l+m_s=m_j##. In all the examples you have posted the ? is that sum.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: QuarkDecay
QuarkDecay said:
Can someone explain to me how we find it?

Let ##|j_1, m_1\rangle |j_2, m_2\rangle## be the state in which the first system has angular momentum ##j_1## and z-component ##m_1##, and the second system has angular momentum ##j_2## and z-component ##m_2##. Let ##|j, m\rangle## in which the total angular momentum is ##j## and the total z-component is ##m##.

Since the z-component of angular momentum, ##m##, is additive, we know that

##|j_1, m_1\rangle |j_2, m_2\rangle = ## some combination of terms of the form ##|j, m\rangle## where
##|j_1 - j_2| \leq j \leq j_1 + j_2## and
##-j \leq m \leq +j##

To start with, it's clear that if ##m_1 = j_1## and ##m_2 = j_2##, then there is only one possibility:

1. ##|j_1, j_1\rangle |j_2, j_2\rangle = |(j_1 + j_2), (j_1 + j_2)\rangle## (The case with ##j = j_1 + j_2## and ##m = m_1 + m_2##)

Now, we use the lowering operators:

2. ##J^- = J_1^{-} + J_2^{-}##

You use the fact that
3. ##J^{-} |j, m\rangle = \sqrt{j (j+1) - m (m-1)}|j, m-1\rangle##
4. ##J_1^{-} |j_1, m_1\rangle |j_2, m_2\rangle = \sqrt{j_1 (j_1+1) - m_1 (m_1-1)}|j_1, m_1 - 1\rangle |j_2, m_2\rangle##
5. ##J_2^{-} |j_1, m_1\rangle |j_2, m_2\rangle = \sqrt{j_2 (j_2+1) - m_2 (m_2-1)}|j_1, m_1\rangle |j_2, m_2 - 1\rangle##

(##J_1^{-}## doesn't affect ##|j_2, m_2\rangle## and ##J_2^{-}## doesn't affect ##|j_1, m_1\rangle##)

So applying ##J_1^{-} + J_2^{-}## to the left side of equation 1, and applying ##J^{-}## to the right side gives us:

6. ##\sqrt{j_1 (j_1+1) - m_1 (m_1-1)} |j_1, j_1 - 1\rangle |j_2, j_2\rangle ##
##+ \sqrt{j_2 (j_2+1) - m_2 (m_2-1)} |j_1, j_1\rangle |j_2, j_2 - 1\rangle##
##= \sqrt{(j_1 + j _1)(j_1+j_2 +1) - (j_1 + j_2) (j_1 + j_2 -1)} |(j_1 + j_2), (j_1 + j_2 - 1)\rangle##

You can continue using ##J^{-}## to get all the coefficients for ##|j, m\rangle## with ##j = j_1 + j_2##.

Now, let's look at the case where ##j = j_1 + j_2 - 1##. How do you figure out that case? Well, let's look at the case ##j = j_1 + j_2 - 1## and ##m = j_1 + j_2 - 1##. We know that that has to be some combination of ##m_1 = j_1, m_2 = j_2 -1## and ##m_1 = j_1, m_2 = j_2##. Those are the only two ways to get ##m = m_1 + m_2##. So we know that there must be coefficients ##\alpha## and ##\beta## such that:

##\alpha |j_1, j_1 - 1\rangle |j_2, j_1\rangle + \beta |j_1, j_1\rangle |j_2, m_2 - 1\rangle = |(j_1 + j_2 - 1), (j_1 + j_2 - 1)\rangle##

So we have to figure out what ##\alpha## and ##\beta## must be. That's two unknowns. But we also have two constraints: (1) This state must be orthogonal to the state ##|(j_1 + j_2), (j_1 + j_2 - 1)\rangle##, and (2) ##|\alpha|^2 + |\beta|^2 = 1## (it has to be normalized). Those two constraints uniquely determine ##\alpha## and ##\beta## up to an unknown phase factor. (I'm not sure if there is some standard convention for picking the phase).

Once you know ##|j, m\rangle## for the case ##j = j_1 + j_2 - 1##, ##m = j_1 + j_2 - 1##, you can again use the lowering operators to find the states for all other values of ##m##.

Then you can again use orthogonality to find the state ##|j, m\rangle## with ##j = j_1 + j_2 - 2## and ##m = j_1 + j_2 - 2##.

Continuing in this way, you can find all the possibilities for ##|j, m\rangle##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: QuarkDecay

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K