Chemistry C-H bond enthelpy of halogenated hydrocarbons

  • Thread starter Thread starter arrowhead1232
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bond
AI Thread Summary
The C-H bond enthalpy in halogenated hydrocarbons follows the order CH3I > CH3F > CH3Br > CH3Cl. Fluorine's unique properties, including a weak F-F bond due to repulsions from nonbonding electron pairs, contribute to its higher C-H bond enthalpy compared to other halogens. The small size of the fluorine atom exacerbates these repulsions, leading to weaker bonding characteristics. Additionally, fluorine's behavior is notably distinct from that of larger halogens like chlorine, bromine, and iodine. Understanding these differences is crucial for explaining the observed bond enthalpy trends.
arrowhead1232
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Hi, so based on data collected from databases, I found a trend in the C-H bond enthalpy of halogenated hydrocarbons such as those with the formula CH3X



In this case, the C-H bond enthalpy increases following this order: CH3I (greatest C-H bond enthalpy)> CH3F > CH3BR >CH3CL (lowest C-H bond enthalpy)



It can be seen that the CH bond enthalpy generally increases further down the halogens group, but fluorine is an exception to this trend, does anyone know why?
Relevant Equations
N/A
In this case, the C-H bond enthalpy increases following this order: CH3I (greatest C-H bond enthalpy)> CH3F > CH3BR >CH3CL (lowest C-H bond enthalpy)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't know the definitive answer, but there are some properties that may help you explain the case with F. The following data taken from Inorganic Chemistry by Miessler.Halogen, electron affinity, ##\Delta## H of dissociation
F, 328, 158
Cl, 349, 242
Br, 325, 192
I, 295, 151
At, 270A few notes about F from text:

it is likely that the weakness of the F-F bond is largely a consequence of the repulsions between the nonbonding electron pairs. the small size of the fluorine atom brings these pairs into close proximity when F-F bonds are formed. Electrostatic repulsions between these pairs on neighboring atoms result in weaker bonding and an equilibrium bond distance significantly greater than would be expected in the absence of such repulsions.
 
In general fluorine is notorious for being "different" from its heavier cousins.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Back
Top