C/C++ C++ Vectors: Finding Values in vectors

  • Thread starter Thread starter needOfHelpCMath
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    C++ Vectors
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on correcting a C++ program that aims to count the occurrences of a specific value in a vector. The original code incorrectly initializes the `numMatches` variable and adds values instead of counting matches. The correct approach involves initializing `numMatches` to zero and incrementing it when elements equal `matchValue`. Participants emphasize that understanding program requirements improves with practice, highlighting the rewarding yet challenging nature of coding. Overall, the thread provides valuable insights into proper vector manipulation in C++.
needOfHelpCMath
Messages
70
Reaction score
0
I would like some help or guide to if i am going on the right track on my program ***Set numMatches to the number of elements in userValues (having NUM_VALS elements) that equal matchValue. Ex: If matchValue = 2 and userValues = {2, 2, 1, 2}, then numMatches = 3. ***
Code:
#include <iostream>
#include <vector>
using namespace std;

int main() {
   const int NUM_VALS = 4;
   vector<int> userValues(NUM_VALS);
   int i = 0;
   int matchValue = 0;
   int numMatches = -99; // Assign numMatches with 0 before your for loop

   userValues.at(0) = 2;
   userValues.at(1) = 2;
   userValues.at(2) = 1;
   userValues.at(3) = 2;

   matchValue = 2;

   numMatches= userValues.at(0);
   for (i = 0; i < NUM_VALS; ++i) 
   {
     cin >> userValues.at(i);
   }
         
   for (i = 0; i < NUM_VALS; ++i) {
      numMatches = numMatches + userValues.at(i);
   }
   

   cout << "matchValue: " << matchValue << ", numMatches: " << numMatches << endl;

   return 0;
}

**MY TEST**

Testing matchValue = 2,
userValues = {2, 2, 1, 2}
Expected value: 3
Your value: 9
 
Technology news on Phys.org
You want something like:

Code:
numMatches= 0;
for (i = 0; i < NUM_VALS; i++) 
{
	if (userValues.at(i) == matchValue)
	{
		numMatches++;
	}
}

You see, in your code, you first assign the value of [m]userValues.at(0)[/m] to [m]numMatches[/m], which is 2, and then in your second for loop, you add each of the values in the array to [m]numMatches[/m], so you wind up with:

[m]numMatches = 2 + 2 + 2 + 1 + 2 = 9[/m]

As you can see in the code I wrote, we initialize [m]numMatches[/m] to zero before the loop, and then we check each element of the array to see if it is equal to [m]matchValue[/m], and if it is, then we increment [m]numMatches[/m], so that we get a count of the number of elements that match.

Does this make sense?
 
MarkFL said:
You want something like:

Code:
numMatches= 0;
for (i = 0; i < NUM_VALS; i++) 
{
	if (userValues.at(i) == matchValue)
	{
		numMatches++;
	}
}

You see, in your code, you first assign the value of [m]userValues.at(0)[/m] to [m]numMatches[/m], which is 2, and then in your second for loop, you add each of the values in the array to [m]numMatches[/m], so you wind up with:

[m]numMatches = 2 + 2 + 2 + 1 + 2 = 9[/m]

As you can see in the code I wrote, we initialize [m]numMatches[/m] to zero before the loop, and then we check each element of the array to see if it is equal to [m]matchValue[/m], and if it is, then we increment [m]numMatches[/m], so that we get a count of the number of elements that match.

Does this make sense?

Yes! it does! I am so horrible at understanding what the programs wants...any tips for me so that i can understand what the programs wants. Thank you it made a lot of sense!
 
Understanding the expected output, and how to get it generally comes with practice. Coding can be extremely rewarding, and it can be extremely frustrating at the same time. :)
 
Anthropic announced that an inflection point has been reached where the LLM tools are good enough to help or hinder cybersecurity folks. In the most recent case in September 2025, state hackers used Claude in Agentic mode to break into 30+ high-profile companies, of which 17 or so were actually breached before Anthropic shut it down. They mentioned that Clause hallucinated and told the hackers it was more successful than it was...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
8K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K