Krypton
- 13
- 0
How to calculate, non-graphically, the new limits of integration when change of variables r done to a double integral?
The discussion revolves around the calculation of new limits of integration when performing a change of variables in double integrals, specifically in the context of polar coordinates. Participants explore non-graphical methods for determining these limits, with a focus on the implications of different geometries and the relationships between variables.
Participants express differing views on the necessity of graphical representation versus algebraic methods for determining limits. There is no consensus on a single method or approach, and the discussion remains unresolved regarding the best practices for changing variables in double integrals.
The discussion highlights the complexity of changing variables in double integrals, particularly in polar coordinates, and the dependence on the specific geometry of the region being integrated. Limitations include assumptions about the geometry and the nature of the integrals involved.
Perhaps if you posted a specific example, we could help you out?Krypton said:How to calculate, non-graphically, the new limits of integration when change of variables r done to a double integral?
I DID:Krypton said:Plz show me how u arrived at the new limits '' "
Those values are the angle of the straight line from the origin to each of the two points (b,c), (a,c).HallsofIvy said:integral might be with [itex]\theta[/itex] between arctan(c/b) and arctan(c/a) to get the region between those two lower vertices (I am assuming that d-c> b- a. Otherwise you will "hit" the vertex (b,d) before (a,c).)
Now on each line between those, r must go from the lower line, y= c, to the vertical line x= b. In polar coordinates, that is [itex]r sin(\theta)= c[/itex] to [itex]r cos(\theta)= b[/itex]. That means that r varies from [itex]c/sin(\theta)[/itex] to [itex]b/cos(\theta)[/itex].