Calculate Rear Builder Weight Carrying Torque Up a Ramp

  • Thread starter Thread starter physicsgrouch
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ramp Torque
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the weight carried by the rear builder when two builders lift a sheet of drywall up a ramp. Given parameters include a width (W) of 2.00m, length (L) of 3.10m, and an angle (theta) of 15.0 degrees. The lead builder exerts a force of 123.0N, resulting in a calculated torque of 184 N*m. The final weight carried by the rear builder is determined to be 174.414 N after resolving the torques about the center of mass of the sheet.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of torque calculations in physics
  • Familiarity with the concepts of center of mass and lever arms
  • Basic knowledge of trigonometry, particularly sine and cosine functions
  • Ability to apply coordinate geometry to physical problems
NEXT STEPS
  • Study torque calculations in static equilibrium scenarios
  • Learn about the center of mass and its significance in physics
  • Explore trigonometric applications in real-world physics problems
  • Investigate coordinate geometry techniques for solving mechanical problems
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physics students, engineering students, and professionals involved in mechanical design or structural analysis, particularly those interested in torque and force distribution in lifting scenarios.

physicsgrouch
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Two builders carry a sheet of drywall up a ramp. They exert vertical forces at the lower corners of the sheet. Assume that W = 2.00m, L = 3.10m, theta = 15.0 degrees, and that the lead builder carries a weight of 123.0N (27.7lb). What is the weight carried by the builder at the rear ?

\tau = F\bot*r

I know that there is no rotation of the drywall, and it is a thin, rectangular plate. The lever arm of the leading builder is (L/2) * cos(15). The torque of this builder is thus 123*cos(15)*(1/2)*(L/2) = 184 N*m.

This means that the torque of the other builder must be the same. However, I can't figure out what the lever arm of this other builder is; is it the same as the leader? It looks like the corners produce different lever arms at an angle, but I'm not sure how to prove that. I thought that the lever arm would be shorter by a distance of W*sin(15), but this is wrong. What am I missing?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi physicsgrouch!

You seem to have calculated the torques about the centre of the bottom of the sheet. :frown:

If you want the torque of the force of gravity on the sheet to be zero, you must calculate the torques about the centre of gravity of the sheet (or about any point on a vertical line through it).

Try again! :smile:
 
So...the triangle of the ramp has a similar triangle inside the drywall. The cosine of the angle is W/(length of line through the rectangle at its center of mass). This is similar to another triangle, with the base of the formed trapezoid as the hypotenuse, meaning that the lever arm of the front builder is...3.8637 m?
 
I set up a trapezoid (with an area of half that of the rectangle itself) and got that the lever arm of the lead builder is 1.282 m. So his torque is...152.32 N*m?
 
Wait, sorry, I mean 1.238 m. So that makes the lead builder's torque...152.32 N*m...and the second builder's force to counter the torque is...211.34 N?
 
Crud...I messed up again...I mixed up the base of the trapezoid and the bases of the trapezoid...

I FINALLY got 174.414 N as the other builder's force.

I'm really sorry; I'm very confused myself.
 
What should my answer be?
 
Use coordinates, not Euclid!

Hi physicsgrouch!

(I've just woken up!)

I'm completely confused by your trapezoid. :confused:

All you need to know is the vertical distance from the centre of mass to each corner.

In other words, the x coordinate.

(You seem to be treating this like a geometry problem, using the methods of Euclid - that'll work, but it's far too slow, just use Descartes' invention, the coordinates!)

So just go along half the bottom edge, and get the x coordinate of that length, and then go from there to the c.o.m, and get the x coordinate of that length.

Then you add for one corner, and subtract for the other.

That's all it is! Have a go … :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K