MHB Calculate Simple Interest: 22K/yr, n=44, r=0.5

  • Thread starter Thread starter bjaurique
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Accounting
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the simple interest needed to generate $22,000 per year with an interest rate of 0.5 and a time period of 44, the formula used is S = (r * B * m) / n, where B is the principal amount. Clarification is needed on what "n" and "r" represent, as there is confusion regarding their definitions. The discussion suggests that if it is simple interest, the number of compounding intervals may not be relevant. The user is seeking more information to accurately solve the problem. Understanding the terms involved is crucial for the correct application of the formula.
bjaurique
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
i need to make up 22,000 per year
other pieces of information n=44, r=0.5 what is the formula to calculate what i need to solve this question?
I think its simple interest but am having a hard time remembering all.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
What you need, or what you could provide, is a little more information!

If it is simple interest then, following the wiki article, the amount of interest earned over a period of time $n$ at rate $r$ with capital of $B = 22000$ is

$S = \dfrac{r B m}{n} = \dfrac{0.5 * 22000 * m}{44}$

where $m$ is the number of times $n$ units of time has passed.
 
It would help if you would tell us what "n" and "r" MEAN! Is "r" the interest rate? Is the interest 5% per year? My first guess would be the number of compounding intervals but if this is simple interest that would be irrelevant. And, even if it were compound interest, you say you want to get 22,000 per year- and 44 periods per year would be very peculiar!
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top