Calculate standard enthelpy of change and find heat from one reactant

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the standard change of enthalpy for the oxidation of iron in chemical hand warmers and determining the heat produced from a specific mass of iron (15.0g). The scope includes homework-related calculations and thermochemical concepts.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents a calculation for the standard change of enthalpy using stoichiometric relationships but arrives at a different value than expected.
  • Another participant points out a potential typo in the calculation, correcting the value from -16484.4 kJ to -1648.4 kJ and emphasizes the importance of using the correct stoichiometric coefficients.
  • A participant expresses uncertainty about their understanding of the conversion factor and seeks confirmation on their logic regarding the relationship between moles of iron and moles of iron oxide.
  • Another participant confirms the understanding of the conversion factor and the approach to calculating the heat produced.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the need for correct stoichiometric relationships, but there is no consensus on the final calculated values or the method used to arrive at them. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the correct enthalpy change and heat produced.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the clarity of the stoichiometric relationships and the assumptions made in the calculations. The discussion also reflects some uncertainty in the application of thermochemical principles.

Who May Find This Useful

Students studying thermochemistry, particularly those working on enthalpy calculations and stoichiometry in chemical reactions.

biochem850
Messages
51
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Chemical hand warmers produce heat when they're removed form their airtight plastic wrappers. These hand warmers utilize the oxidation of iron to form iron oxide. Calculate standard change of enthalpy for reaction and compute how much heat is produced from a warmer containing 15.0g Fe?



Homework Equations



Summation notation involving products and reactants to calculate standard enthalpy of change

The Attempt at a Solution



[2(-824.2kj/mol)]-[4(0)+3(0)]= -16484.4kJ/mol iron oxide

I used the stochiometric relationships of the equation of iron+oxygen---> iron oxide to convert grams to moles of iron to moles of iron oxide and used the predetermined standard change of enthalpy and I got -221kJ emitted but the correct answer is -111kJ emitted.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
biochem850 said:
[2(-824.2kj/mol)]-[4(0)+3(0)]= -16484.4kJ/mol iron oxide

Bolding mine. This is a correct stoichiometric coefficient, but you can't use 2 moles and claim the result is per one mole.

And it is 1648.4 kJ, not 16484.4kJ, but that's probably just a typo.
 
Borek said:
Bolding mine. This is a correct stoichiometric coefficient, but you can't use 2 moles and claim the result is per one mole.

And it is 1648.4 kJ, not 16484.4kJ, but that's probably just a typo.

Please forgive me (I'm usually quite good with chemistry but I've been reviewing thermochemistry all day). If I'm understanding what your saying, you would change the conversion factor from 1648.4 kJ/mole to 1648.4 kJ/2 mole iron oxide and use this relationship to convert from 15.0g Fe to moles of Fe to moles of iron oxide and then employ the determined relationship.

I've arrived at the correct answer but I want to be sure my logic is sound (I'm almost done reviewing thermochemistry and I want to move on to the Quantum mechanical model of atoms).

Thanks for your help!
 
biochem850 said:
If I'm understanding what your saying, you would change the conversion factor from 1648.4 kJ/mole to 1648.4 kJ/2 mole iron oxide and use this relationship to convert from 15.0g Fe to moles of Fe to moles of iron oxide and then employ the determined relationship.

And you are understanding correctly.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
40K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
8K