Calculate the time to reach the floor in seconds

  • Thread starter Thread starter LokLe
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Seconds Time
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
10 replies · 2K views
LokLe
Messages
37
Reaction score
5
Homework Statement
In the figure, a mass of 35.8 kg is attached to a light string that is wrapped around a cylindrical spool of radius 0.25m and moment of inertia 7.14 kg · m2. The spool is suspended from the ceiling, and the mass is then released from rest a distance 6.01 m above the floor. How long does it take to reach the floor in seconds?
Relevant Equations
KEi + PEi = KEf + PEf
v = d/t
?verifier=oxZPwzDPmaWt3jsx1dPV2pcoFlNNGYdLuVCwYL9C.jpg

r = 0.25m
I = 7.14kgm^2
h = 6.01m

Ei = Ef
mgh = 1/2mv^2 + 1/2Iw^2
2mgh = mv^2 + I(v^2/r^2)
2(35.8)(9.81)(6.01) = 35.8v^2 + 114.24v^2
v = 5.304 m/s

v = d/t
5.304 = 6.01/t
t = 1.133

(The correct answer is 2.2673. What did I do wrong?)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
on Phys.org
kuruman said:
This equation relates speed to distance and time only if v is the same throughout the interval t. This is not the case here because the speed of the mass changes continuously.
I see. So the answer should be s = 1/2t(v+u)
6.01 = 1/2t(5.304)
t = 2.266s

Thank you for correcting my mistakes
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
Orodruin said:
That’s too many significant digits given the precision of the input data.
Do you mean that it is still incorrect?
 
LokLe said:
Do you mean that it is still incorrect?
It is good practice not to use more significant digits than your input can justify. There is simply not enough precision in the input to claim you know the answer to a precision of a millisecond.

The methodology is correct.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
Orodruin said:
It is good practice not to use more significant digits than your input can justify. There is simply not enough precision in the input to claim you know the answer to a precision of a millisecond.

The methodology is correct.
Ok
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
kuruman said:
Did you mean average speed? In this particular example it doesn't matter, but in general I think that the symbol "d" stands for distance, not displacement, as in the mantra "speed is distance over time."
If d is distance then average speed, if displacement then average velocity.
But my point is that the equation is not limited to constant speed/velocity. It always gives the average, but that can only be supposed to be the same as the instantaneous value if it is constant.