Calculate Unknowns with Sig Figs

  • Thread starter Thread starter Quincy
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating unknown variables while considering significant figures in measurements related to mass, volume, and density of a metal and water. Participants are examining how to properly express these values according to the rules of significant figures.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to determine the correct number of significant figures in various measurements, including mass and volume. There are questions about whether certain values, such as the volume of water, are represented with the correct number of significant figures. Discussions also include how subtraction affects the significant figures of the result.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided clarifications regarding the significant figures of the measurements, while others are questioning the interpretations of these figures. There is an ongoing exploration of how to express results accurately based on the significant figures of the initial measurements.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the rules of significant figures in the context of a homework assignment, which may impose specific constraints on how answers should be formatted. There is also a focus on ensuring that the calculations respect the significant figures derived from the measurements provided.

Quincy
Messages
228
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Calculate the unknown variables to the appropriate significant figures.


The Attempt at a Solution




mass of metal: 6.31 g - 3 sig figs
volume of water: 20.00 mL - 2 sig figs
volume of water + metal: 20.50 mL - 3 sig figs

volume of metal: 20.50 - 20.00 = 0.50 mL - 2 sig figs
density of metal: 13 g/mL - so the answer should have 2 sig figs correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Quincy said:

Homework Statement



Calculate the unknown variables to the appropriate significant figures.


The Attempt at a Solution




mass of metal: 6.31 g - 3 sig figs
volume of water: 20.00 mL - 2 sig figs
No, that's 4 significant figures. That indicates that the measurement might be as much as 20.005 or as little as 19.995 but rounds off to 20.00. If only 2 significant figures were intended, if it might be as high as 20.5 or as low as 19.5, then it would be written as "20. mL". If 3 significant figures were intended (as high as 20.05 or as low as 19.95), it would be written 20.0.

volume of water + metal: 20.50 mL - 3 sig fig
Again, that is 4 significant figures
volume of metal: 20.50 - 20.00 = 0.50 mL - 2 sig figs
Because it is determined by subtracting two figures of 4 significant figures, the result should be to 4 significant figures. It would be better written as 5.000 x 10-1.

[/quote]density of metal: 13 g/mL - so the answer should have 2 sig figs correct?[/QUOTE]
Since you got that by dividing 6.31 g (3 significant figures) by 5.000 x 10-1 mL (4 significant figures) the result should be of the lesser of those: 3 significant figures. Which would be better written 13.0 g/mL or 1.30 x 10-1 g/L
 
0.50 - is this 3 significant figures btw?
 
Quincy said:
0.50 - is this 3 significant figures btw?

No it's two significant figures.
It is one that catches people out because 1.50 WOULD be 3 figures.
The trick is that you could write it as "5.0 divided by 10" and so using only two figures give exactly the same accuracy.
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K