Calculating a matrix element & first order shift

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the calculation of matrix elements involving the operators A and A† in quantum mechanics. The user clarifies that A|n⟩ equals √n|n-1⟩ and A†|n⟩ equals √(n+1)|n+1⟩, resolving confusion about the terms yielding 2n instead of 2n+1. The mathematical expressions provided demonstrate the inner product relationships and the significance of understanding operator actions on quantum states.

PREREQUISITES
  • Quantum mechanics fundamentals
  • Understanding of Hilbert space and unbounded operators
  • Matrix mechanics and operator algebra
  • Familiarity with bra-ket notation and inner products
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of unbounded operators in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about the implications of the commutation relations between operators
  • Explore the derivation of matrix elements in quantum mechanics
  • Investigate the role of ladder operators in quantum harmonic oscillators
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in quantum mechanics, physicists working with quantum states, and anyone interested in the mathematical foundations of quantum theory.

StephvsEinst
Science Advisor
Messages
41
Reaction score
1
So I saw this a moment ago:
Sem Título.png

How can the second and third terms yield (n+1)+(n-1)=2n and not (n+1)+n=2n+1?
PS: I solved the problem by using [a,a(+)]=1.

Sorry, this is very simple but I cannot figure out what I did wrong.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's not clear to me what A|n> is equal to. This is very important, since (dropping the finesse of domain issues linked to unbounded operators on Hilbert space)

[tex]\langle n, A^{\dagger} A n\rangle = \langle A^{\dagger\dagger} n, A n\rangle = \langle A n, A n\rangle[/tex]

[tex]\langle n, A A^{\dagger} n\rangle = \langle A^{\dagger} n, A^{\dagger} n\rangle = \sqrt{n+1}^2 = n+1[/tex]
 
Last edited:
Thank you, I understood your answer: simple and pratical.
Here, A|n> is equal to sqrt(n)|n-1> and A(+)|n> is equal to sqrt(n+1)|n+1>.

PS: Sorry for not using the math font but I am too lazy right now to insert it in latex.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K