How to calculate the interband velocity matrix in a graphene system

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The calculation of the interband velocity matrix in a graphene system can be approached using two distinct methods. The first method derives the velocity operator from the Hamiltonian using the formula v = ∂H/ħ∂p, yielding components v_x = v_F cos(θ) and v_y = v_F sin(θ) for intraband velocity. The second method, as outlined in Mikhailov's 2016 paper, employs equations of motion to derive the velocity operator indirectly. Both methods ultimately yield the same results, but differ in their mathematical approaches.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Hamiltonian mechanics in quantum physics
  • Familiarity with the velocity operator in quantum mechanics
  • Knowledge of equations of motion for quantum systems
  • Basic concepts of graphene physics and its electronic properties
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the velocity operator from Hamiltonian mechanics in quantum systems
  • Read Mikhailov's paper on nonlinear electrodynamic effects in graphene for deeper insights
  • Explore the implications of the equations of motion in quantum mechanics
  • Investigate the role of momentum in calculating physical properties of graphene
USEFUL FOR

Researchers in condensed matter physics, quantum physicists, and materials scientists focusing on graphene and its electronic properties will benefit from this discussion.

Sunny Huang
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
In graphene system, the velocity operator sometimes is v= ∂H/ħ∂p, and its matrix element is calculated as <ψ|v|ψ>, i.e., v_x = v_F cos(θ) and v_y = v_F sin(θ) [the results are the same with Eq. 25] for intraband velocity. Recently, I see a new way to calculate the velocity matrix (Mikhailov, Sergey A. "Quantum theory of the third-order nonlinear electrodynamic effects of graphene." Physical Review B 93.8 (2016): 085403.). But I cannot understand the Eq. 20 (see the following picture). Additionally, what the difference between the two ways to define the velocity operator?
WX20200619-130539@2x.png

?hash=a3b4a1c2177c20e8308553c65c300a66.png
 

Attachments

  • WX20200619-130557@2x.png
    WX20200619-130557@2x.png
    21.3 KB · Views: 199
Physics news on Phys.org
The two ways of calculating the velocity operator are essentially the same; they just use different mathematical methods to calculate the same values. The first way is to use the Hamiltonian to derive the velocity operator as v= ∂H/ħ∂p, where H is the Hamiltonian and p is the momentum. This method has been used for a long time and is well known in condensed matter physics.The second way, as described in Mikhailov's paper, is to calculate the velocity operator by using the equations of motion. In this method, the equations of motion for electrons in graphene are written as \frac{\partial \psi (r)}{\partial t} = \frac{1}{i\hbar} \left[ H_{0} + \sum_{i=1}^{4} H_{i} , \psi (r) \right]where H_0 is the kinetic energy and H_i are the interaction terms. Then, the velocity operator is derived from these equations of motion asv_{x,y} = \frac{1}{i\hbar} \left[ H_{0} + \sum_{i=1}^{4} H_{i} , x_{x,y} \right]The main difference between the two approaches is that the first approach is a direct calculation of the velocity operator from the Hamiltonian, while the second approach is an indirect calculation of the velocity operator from the equations of motion.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
7K
  • · Replies 175 ·
6
Replies
175
Views
28K
  • · Replies 125 ·
5
Replies
125
Views
20K