Calculating Change in Length of Rubber Tube

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the change in length of a rubber tube when a 100 g ball is spun in a circular motion at one revolution per second. The centripetal force (F_c) is equated to the elastic force (F_el) using the formulas F_c = mass * length * omega^2 and F_el = k * delta L. Participants initially calculated delta L incorrectly, with values ranging from 0.002 m to 0.09 m. The correct calculation, accounting for omega as 2π radians, yields a change in length of approximately 0.0857 m.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of centripetal force and its calculation
  • Familiarity with Hooke's Law and elastic force
  • Basic knowledge of angular velocity and its units
  • Proficiency in algebraic manipulation of equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the relationship between centripetal force and elastic force in rotating systems
  • Learn about angular velocity and its conversion from revolutions per second to radians per second
  • Explore Hooke's Law in greater detail, including applications in real-world scenarios
  • Practice solving problems involving elastic materials under dynamic conditions
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, mechanical engineers, and anyone interested in the dynamics of elastic materials in rotational motion.

huskydc
Messages
78
Reaction score
0
A 100 g ball is attached to a rubber tube and is spun around in a circle at a rate of one revolution every second. A force of 0.5 N is required to stretch the tube 1.0 cm.

If the original length is L = 1.0 m, what will be the change in length of the rubber tube when the ball is revolving?

It was given as a hint that centripetal force is equal to elastic force:

F_c=mass *length*omega^2,

where length is now the stretched length, that is,
length= L+delta L.

The elastic force is equal to
F_el=k*delta L.

first, I found k to be 50. but I plugged in k to the above equation and tried to find delta L. as .002 , but it's incorrect, hints?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I get delta L = about 0.09m.

I see nothing wrong with your approach. You must have a calculation error.
 
0.09 is also incorrect...
 
Last edited:
I found delta L to be .002 m as well.
Here's what I did.

Fc=m*(dL+1)*w^2
Fs=k*dL

.5 N=k*.01 m
k=50 N/m

Fc=Fs
m*(dL+1)*w^2=k*dL
m*w^2=k*dL - m*w^2*dL
m*w^2=dL*(k-m*w^2)
dL=(m*w^2)/(k-m*w^2)

When you plug in the values (m=.1 kg; w=1 rps; k=50 N/m) the answer is dL=.1/49.9
So dL = .020 m
 
Last edited:
I also get 0.09 (0.086) m...

\Delta L = \frac{mL \omega^2}{k-m\omega^2}\approx 0.09 m
 
Last edited:
=( , i tried them all, none of them works...
 
I agree with Gokul; the answer is about 0.09m. What makes you think that this answer is wrong?

zwtipp05 said:
I found delta L to be .002 m as well.
Here's what I did.
...
dL=(m*w^2)/(k-m*w^2)

When you plug in the values (m=.1 kg; w=1 rps; k=50 N/m) the answer is dL=.1/49.9
So dL = .020 m
\omega = 2 \pi, not 1. (It's measured in radians.)
 
the answer turns out to be .0857m, I guess we'er all too caught up in the big picture and totally forgot about the omega being 2pi, thanks
 

Similar threads

Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K