Calculating E field at a Distance with 2 Intercepting Spheres

  • Thread starter Thread starter likephysics
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Field
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the electric field at a point P within the overlapping region of two spheres with uniform charge densities, one positive and one negative. The spheres have a radius a and are separated by a distance δ, with the charge densities represented as +/-ρ. Participants are tasked with demonstrating that the electric field E(P) in the overlapping region is constant and given by a specific expression.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the application of Gauss' Law and superposition to find the electric field due to each sphere. There are attempts to express the electric field in terms of the charge density and the geometry of the spheres. Questions arise regarding the correct application of formulas and the interpretation of the region of interest.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants sharing various approaches and questioning each other's reasoning. Some participants have suggested using Gauss' Law and have pointed out potential misunderstandings regarding the geometry of the problem and the application of the superposition principle. There is no explicit consensus yet, but several productive lines of inquiry are being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating constraints related to the geometry of the spheres and the definitions of the electric field within the overlapping region. There are discussions about the assumptions made regarding the distances involved and the implications for the calculations of the electric field.

likephysics
Messages
638
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement


consider 2 uniform static electric charge densities +/-\rho located in the volumes defined by the 2 intercepting spheres of radius a. Charges are located in free space and \rho\delta is a constant c.
The center of the spheres are separated by distance \delta
The upper sphere has charge density +\rho and lower has -\rho

Show that E(P) in the region belonging to both spheres is constant and given by -\hat{z}c/3\epsilon0


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution




Charge Q= \rho(4/3pi a3)

I tried for +ve charged sphere E(P) = (Q/(4pi\epsilon)R3)[ 3 R.d/R2 R-d]

I was able to get
E(P) = \rhoa3/3epsilonR3 [ 3 R \delta/R2 R-\delta]

I tried to use superposition and calculate E field due to each sphere and add up. But didn't get anywhere.
 

Attachments

  • pf.jpg
    pf.jpg
    4.5 KB · Views: 368
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
likephysics said:
Charge Q= \rho(4/3pi a3)

I tried for +ve charged sphere E(P) = (Q/(4pi\epsilon)R3)[ 3 R.d/R2 R-d]

And how did you get this? If the positively charged sphere was at the origin instead, what would its electric field be inside and out (don't forget to include its direction)? What do you get when you shift your origin down \delta units along the z-axis (i.e. \textbf{r}\to\textbf{r}-\delta\hat{\mathbf{z}})?
 
I used the formula
E(P) = Kq/r2 \hat{r}

\hat{r} = r/r

r= (R-R')
here R'=\delta/2 \hat{z}
For a sphere at origin, R'=0.

After simplification and from Cheng's Field and EM waves eqn 3.26
E(P) = kq/R3 ( 3 R.d/R2 R-d]

(k=4piepsilon)
 
likephysics said:
I used the formula
E(P) = Kq/r2 \hat{r}

\hat{r} = r/r

r= (R-R')
here R'=\delta/2 \hat{z}


But that's the expression for the field due to a point charge. Use Gauss' Law instead (and start with the simple case of a sphere at the origin); you will find a different expression inside the sphere.

For a sphere at origin, R'=0.

After simplification and from Cheng's Field and EM waves eqn 3.26
E(P) = kq/R3 ( 3 R.d/R2 R-d]

(k=4piepsilon)

I don't have a copy of that text, but this equation doesn't look right at all.
 
Okay. I am trying to use just gauss law. But not sure about the R when the sphere is d/2 above the origin.
The first sphere is centered at R1, which is +d/2 above the origin and the second at R2, which is -d/2 from the origin.

E(P) for the first sphere is \rhoa3/3\epsilonR12

for the second sphere E(P) is
- \rhoa3/3\epsilonR22
I tried to express R1 and R2 in terms of R.
R1+d/2 =R
R2-d/2 =R

Adding the E fields I got
\rhoa3/3\epsilon (2Rd/(R+d/2)2(R-d/2)2)
This is no where near what I want.
 
likephysics said:
E(P) for the first sphere is \rhoa3/3\epsilonR12

No, it isn't. Show your work and explain each step in your application of Gauss' Law.
 
π²³ ∞ ° → ~ µ ρ σ τ ω ∑ … √ ∫ ≤ ≥ ± ∃ · θ φ ψ Ω α β γ δ ∂ ∆ ∇ ε λ Λ Γ ô

Ok.
charge Q = ρ*volume
Q= ρ 4pi a3/3

E field at P is

\ointE.ds = Q/ε

E.Area = Q/ε

E = Q/A.ε

Area of sphere with radius R1 is 4piR12
R1 is the distance from the center of sphere 1 to point P.

E= ρ 4pia3/3ε*4pi*a2


E= ρ a3/3εR12
 
Gauss' Law involves the charge enclosed by your Gaussian surface. For R1<a, that will not be the same as the total charge of the sphere.
 
R1 is not < a. It's >a. It's the sphere with radius comparable to R. R1 is the distance from the center of the 1st sphere to the point P.
 
  • #10
You are asked to find the electric field at a point "belonging to both spheres". That means the point will be inside each sphere and so R1<a
 
  • #11
Well, the problem asks to find E(P) in the region belonging to both spheres. Since it's E(P), I thought it was E field at point P.
If I take the region belonging to both spheres,
Q will be ρ4pi (a-δ/2)^3/3ε
 
  • #12
likephysics said:
Well, the problem asks to find E(P) in the region belonging to both spheres. Since it's E(P), I thought it was E field at point P.
If I take the region belonging to both spheres,
Q will be ρ4pi (a-δ/2)^3/3ε

That looks better! What does that give you for the field due to the positive sphere? Apply the same method to the negative sphere and then usde the superposition principle.
 
  • #13
π²³ ∞ ° → ~ µ ρ σ τ ω ∑ … √ ∫ ≤ ≥ ± ∃ · θ φ ψ Ω α β γ δ ∂ ∆ ∇ ε λ Λ Γ ô

Got close, but not the answer.

For the positive sphere

E1 will be

E1 (4pia2) = ρ4pi (a-δ/2)^3/3ε

E1 = ρ(a-δ/2)^3/3εa2

Similarly, for the negatively charged sphere

E2 = -ρ(a+δ/2)^3/3εa2

Combining,

E = (ρ/3εa) 2δ

But the required answer is E= -\hat{z} (ρδ)/3ε

I can't figure out where I am going wrong.
 
  • #14
Why are you dividing by 4\pi a^2? That's not really the surface area of your Gaussian surface is it?
 
  • #15
gabbagabbahey said:
Why are you dividing by 4\pi a^2? That's not really the surface area of your Gaussian surface is it?

Isn't it? When calculating E only for the +ve sphere, the area is 4pia2.
 
  • #16
likephysics said:
Isn't it? When calculating E only for the +ve sphere, the area is 4pia2.

The radius of your Gaussian sphere should be the distance from the center to the point you are looking at. If you are looking at a point inside the sphere, that radius will be lees than a.
 
  • #17
I agree that radius will be less than a. But I am trying to use superposition theorem. I should be able to get the answer by calculating E for reach sphere and then adding, correct?
Why should I consider the area of overlap?
 
  • #18
You seem to be confusing yourself here. Forget about the actual problem at hand for a moment and calculate the field due to a single uniformly charged sphere, centered at the origin. What is the field inside the sphere? What is the field outside? Show your calculations.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
7K