Calculating force and work done with 3D vectors

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the force and work done for an object following a specified trajectory. The force acting on the object is derived as F(t) = -4t^-2 i - 3/2 t^-3/2 j, which is confirmed to be in the correct vector form. To find the work done between t=1 and t=2, the user is advised to compute the integral of the dot product of force and displacement, expressed as ∫(F ⋅ dr). However, the user encounters a negative value when applying the limits, indicating a potential error in the integration or limits used. Clarification is sought on the correct approach to ensure accurate calculation of work done.
r.physics
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
The question is as follows:

An object of mass m=1 follows the trajectory:

r(t) = 4 ln(t) i + 6t1/2 j + 2t k

Calculate the force acting on the object and hence find work done between t=1 and t=2.

I know that Force = Mass * Acceleration

Therefore, F(t) = 1 * a(t)

I also know that a(t) = r(t)''

After differentiating I end up with r(t)'' = -4t-2 i - 3/2 t-3/2 j

So I've ended up with

F(t) = -4t-2 i - 3/2 t-3/2 j

Is that my final answer for the force acting on the object, do I leave it in vector form?

For the work done part, I know that Work Done = Force x Distance

I have force and displacement in vector form but I don't know how to end up with a completely numerical value as I've got a time interval for t, I'm assuming there will be some sort of integration involved.

Can someone please tell me if I have done the first part correctly (calculating the force acting on the object) and if so how can I use this along with the conditions t=1 and t=2 to calculate work done? Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
r.physics said:
Is that my final answer for the force acting on the object, do I leave it in vector form?
I think so, for the general concept of force contains its direction.
For the remained part, I suggest you try to calculate the tiny work ##dW## with the tiny displacement ##d\mathbf{r}## and then get their sum.
 
tommyxu3 said:
I think so, for the general concept of force contains its direction.
For the remained part, I suggest you try to calculate the tiny work ##dW## with the tiny displacement ##d\mathbf{r}## and then get their sum.

Thankyou for your reply. If I'm understanding what your suggesting correctly, I would now do:

∫dw = ∫ (F ⋅ dr) between the limits of t=2 and t=1

This leaves me with

Δw = [ 4t-1 i + 3t-1/2 j + 2 k ]⋅[4 ln(t) i + 6t1/2 j + 2t k]

With the limits being 2 and 1, I don't think I have done what you meant correctly as when I plug the limits in I end up with a negative answer for work done, any idea where I'm going wrong?

Thanks!
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
857
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
889
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
921