Calculating Kinetic Energy Using Uniform Velocity and Energy Equations

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating kinetic energy using the equation Ek = 1/2 m v^2 in the context of a scenario where Avdol lifts a 35 kg box to a height of 2.0 m. Participants debated whether Avdol or gravity performed the work, concluding that both contribute to the work done, with the total work being zero if the box is not accelerated further. The final kinetic energy calculated using the derived velocity of 6.3 m/s is 690 J, demonstrating the application of energy equations in physics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of kinetic energy equations, specifically Ek = 1/2 m v^2
  • Knowledge of gravitational potential energy and its relation to height (mgh)
  • Familiarity with the concept of work in physics
  • Basic algebra for manipulating equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of kinetic energy from gravitational potential energy
  • Learn about the work-energy principle in physics
  • Explore the implications of uniform velocity on work done
  • Investigate the relationship between force, displacement, and work
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, educators teaching energy concepts, and anyone interested in understanding the principles of work and energy in mechanics.

UnknownQuestioner
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Avdol lifted a 35 kg box at uniform velocity from the ground up to a height of 2.0m.

a) Jotaro commented Avdol did work. Polnareff says gravity did work. Who is correct? Explain?

b) If Avdol then accidentally dropped it. How much kinetic energy will there be right before it lands? Explain your reasoning. (2 marks)
Relevant Equations
Ek = 1/2 m v^2
For:
a) Avdol did the work because he is the force that is causing the displacement, right?

b) Is there another formula we would have to use? I am confused at how this would work out and what the answer would be.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
UnknownQuestioner said:
Homework Statement:: Avdol lifted a 35 kg box at uniform velocity from the ground up to a height of 2.0m.

a) Jotaro commented Avdol did work. Polnareff says gravity did work. Who is correct? Explain?

b) If Avdol then accidentally dropped it. How much kinetic energy will there be right before it lands? Explain your reasoning. (2 marks)
Relevant Equations:: Ek = 1/2 m v^2

For:
a) Avdol did the work because he is the force that is causing the displacement, right?

b) Is there another formula we would have to use? I am confused at how this would work out and what the answer would be.

That's correct for a). For b) where does the kinetic energy come from?
 
The kinetic energy would be the force of gravity pulling?
 
UnknownQuestioner said:
The kinetic energy would be the force of gravity pulling?

Can you think of something other than force?
 
Sorry I am not sure
 
UnknownQuestioner said:
Sorry I am not sure
Regarding this and your other post, the rules are that you must make an effort to solve the problem. We can help but we cannot do the work for you.

You need to have a think about the material you have been studying and what is relevant to a question like this.
 
Oh ok, sorry about that, I will re-attempt and try to do the problem again with more research. Thanks
 
UnknownQuestioner said:
a) Jotaro commented Avdol did work. Polnareff says gravity did work. Who is correct? Explain?

I think I can tell what the wording is implying, but this is an awful question? Both do work, and the total work is zero. Hmm
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: SammyS
I used √2gh = v to get velocity (6.3 m/s) then used that in Ek = 1/2 m v^2 to get a final kinetic energy of 690 J. Would this be the correct way to do this?
 
  • #10
etotheipi said:
I think I can tell what the wording is implying, but this is an awful question? Both do work, and the total work is zero. Hmm
Agreed, the intended answer is that both are right. But it is unclear whether the total work is zero. We are not told that Avdol stops it at that height, or whether we are to include the work done to accelerate it to the given speed.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: etotheipi
  • #11
UnknownQuestioner said:
I used √2gh = v to get velocity (6.3 m/s) then used that in Ek = 1/2 m v^2 to get a final kinetic energy of 690 J. Would this be the correct way to do this?
It is one way, but a bit roundabout. Combining those equations, Ek = 1/2 m v^2 = 1/2 m (√(2gh))^2 = mgh. How could you have got that straightaway?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
932
Replies
55
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 56 ·
2
Replies
56
Views
4K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K