MHB Calculating Listeners Tuning in 8-9am: Least/Greatest #s

AI Thread Summary
A radio station claims that 55% of listeners tune in between 8 and 9 am, prompting a competing station to survey 1,000 listeners to verify this claim. The survey results indicate that the claim cannot be rejected, and the correct range of listeners who could have said they listen is between 519 and 581. The margin of error was calculated using the formula E = 1/√n, leading to the conclusion that the initial calculations were on the right track. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding confidence intervals and the application of margin of error in statistical analysis. Ultimately, the correct interpretation confirms the range of listeners aligns with the station's claim.
markosheehan
Messages
133
Reaction score
0
a radio station claims 55% of all listeners tune into their program between 8 and 9 am. To check this claim a competing radio station does a survey of a random sample of listeners in the 8 to 9 am time slot. the survey indicates the claim can not be rejected. if the sample size is 1000 people determine the least and greatest number of listeners that could of said they listen to the radio station.

this is what i have tried but i am not getting the right answer.

p=.55

using the margin of error formula. 1/ √1000 = .03126
so I would of thought the answer would be 1.55 +/- .03126 multiplied by a thousand. this does not give the right answer. the right answer is 519 to 581
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
markosheehan said:
a radio station claims 55% of all listeners tune into their program between 8 and 9 am. To check this claim a competing radio station does a survey of a random sample of listeners in the 8 to 9 am time slot. the survey indicates the claim can not be rejected. if the sample size is 1000 people determine the least and greatest number of listeners that could of said they listen to the radio station.

this is what i have tried but i am not getting the right answer.

p=.55

using the margin of error formula. 1/ √1000 = .03126
so I would of thought the answer would be 1.55 +/- .03126 multiplied by a thousand. this does not give the right answer. the right answer is 519 to 581

Hi markosheehan,

So this question basically comes down to finding a reasonable interval that we would expect the numbers to fluctuate between. This is often called a "confidence interval" and corresponds to a "fail to reject region" of the null hypothesis. I'm not sure how the material is being presented in your course but can you tell me how you've been told to apply the margin of error formula?

Basically no matter what this is going to look like this: $555 \pm \text{noise}$. Different teachers and courses approach this differently so I'm curious as to what you've been told to do. The answer you provided is not symmetric. Can you confirm that the answer should be 519 to 581? If it were 529 to 581 then that would be symmetric, that is $555 \pm 26$.
 
519, 581 is the answer at the back of the book.

Usually we use the margin of error formula
E=1/✓n

We have also used the margin of error (for c% confidence interval) E=z* standard deviation of proportion where z is 1.96 at the 95 % confidence. I'm not too sure how this formula works or what it is even used for. But anyway it can not be used here due to the reason we are not given the standard deviation of the population.
 
markosheehan said:
519, 581 is the answer at the back of the book.

Usually we use the margin of error formula
E=1/✓n

We have also used the margin of error (for c% confidence interval) E=z* standard deviation of proportion where z is 1.96 at the 95 % confidence. I'm not too sure how this formula works or what it is even used for. But anyway it can not be used here due to the reason we are not given the standard deviation of the population.

We don't know the standard deviation of the population, but we do know that SD of the sample. See this page. It looks like this isn't the way you are going though for this homework.

Your original formula was:
[math]\left(55 \pm \frac{1}{\sqrt{1000}} \right) \times 1000 = (519,581)[/math]

So actually you had it right the first time. :)
 
thanks
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
9K
Back
Top