Calculating Muon Half-Life: Length Contraction vs Time Dilation

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the calculation of muon half-life using both non-relativistic and relativistic methods. The non-relativistic method yields a half-life of 21.8 microseconds, while the relativistic approach, which incorporates time dilation for the muon in the Earth frame and length contraction for the muon in its own frame, results in a consistent half-life of 4.36 microseconds. Both methods ultimately agree on the observable outcome of 4.36 half-lives occurring during the muon's travel to Earth. The conversation raises questions about the necessity of using both time dilation and length contraction in these calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of special relativity concepts, specifically time dilation and length contraction.
  • Familiarity with the muon particle and its properties.
  • Basic knowledge of half-life calculations in physics.
  • Ability to interpret relativistic effects in different reference frames.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of special relativity, focusing on time dilation and length contraction.
  • Explore the muon decay process and its significance in particle physics.
  • Investigate the implications of relativistic effects on measurements in different frames of reference.
  • Review experimental results related to muon travel and half-life measurements.
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and researchers interested in particle physics and the implications of special relativity on time and space measurements.

mananvpanchal
Messages
215
Reaction score
0
This link is confusing me.

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/relativ/muon.html

In this link, with non-relativistic method, half life is calculated as 21.8.

But with relativistic method half life is calculated as 4.36.

We calculate half life considering time dilation for muon in Earth frame.
And, we calculate half life considering length contraction for muon in muon frame.
We get same value using both method as 4.36.

So, the question is:
Would length contraction and time dilation both not exist for muon?
Would we not include both factor in equation to calculate half life?
Why are we using length contraction and time dilation one by one to calculate half life?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mananvpanchal said:
In this link, with non-relativistic method, half life is calculated as 21.8.

But with relativistic method half life is calculated as 4.36.
Those are not half lives, but the travel time expressed in terms of half life.
We calculate half life considering time dilation for muon in Earth frame.
And, we calculate half life considering length contraction for muon in muon frame.
We get same value using both method as 4.36.
Both observers agree that 4.36 half lives will occur during the muon's travel to the earth.
So, the question is:
Would length contraction and time dilation both not exist for muon?
Would we not include both factor in equation to calculate half life?
Why are we using length contraction and time dilation one by one to calculate half life?
The muon travels from some distance above the Earth to the Earth's surface. In the muon's frame, it has a certain half-life. Viewed from the earth, time dilation will apply to the moving muon's half-life; length contraction is not relevant since the distance is in the Earth frame. Viewed from the muon's frame, it's the distance traveled that will be contracted; time dilation is not relevant since the muon is at rest in its own frame. Those end up being two different yet equivalent descriptions of what happens; each description leads to the same observable result.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 63 ·
3
Replies
63
Views
6K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
764
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K