syfry
- 172
- 21
robphy said:With length-contraction (in the second diagram)[the separation of the worldlines marking the ends of the X-arm (along the relative-velocity axis) is shorter],the signal along the relative-velocity axis has a shorter round-trip time so thatthe reception events TY and TX are now coincident, as experimentally observed,in accord with the principle of relativity.
The interactive demo on your website looks good! Really cool you created that. Even if I don't know how to use it, can still appreciate it.
So if I'm understanding your attached images correctly, the first image is what they expected, but instead they got the second image. After some zooming closer into the image's details, yeah it's apparent that the light would travel a longer distance in the first image, and that the red TX dot has moved down to overlap the green TY dot in the second image. (I'm assuming the light is traveling from bottom left to top right)
Then they modeled a length contraction to explain such a result.
What I don't get is why would any part of the apparatus be length contracted since it's in the same reference frame as the observers? (in the same room)
That's why I was confused and thought maybe they were length contracting the light itself.