MHB Calculating Numbers with Common Factors: A Scientific Approach

  • Thread starter Thread starter evinda
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Numbers
evinda
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,741
Reaction score
0
Hello! (Wave)

I am looking at the following exercise:

Find how many numbers $k$ with $1 \leq k \leq 3600$ exist,that have at least one common factor $>1$ with $3600$.

I thought that the number we are looking for is equal to:
$$3600-\phi(3600)=3600-\phi(2^4 \cdot 3^2 \cdot 5^2 )=3600-3600(1-\frac{1}{2})(1-\frac{1}{3})(1-\frac{1}{5})=3600 \cdot \frac{11}{15}=2640$$

Could you tell me if it is right? (Thinking) (Nerd)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
evinda said:
Hello! (Wave)

I am looking at the following exercise:

Find how many numbers $k$ with $1 \leq k \leq 3600$ exist,that have at least one common factor $>1$ with $3600$.

I thought that the number we are looking for is equal to:
$$3600-\phi(3600)=3600-\phi(2^4 \cdot 3^2 \cdot 5^2 )=3600-3600(1-\frac{1}{2})(1-\frac{1}{3})(1-\frac{1}{5})=3600 \cdot \frac{11}{15}=2640$$

Could you tell me if it is right? (Thinking) (Nerd)
That's right. :)
 
M R said:
That's right. :)

Great! Thanks a lot! (Happy)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
965
Replies
3
Views
875
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Back
Top