Calculating Orthogonal Projection: Proving AD and Formula Progress | \pi\rangle

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the calculation of orthogonal projection using the dot product formula, specifically the relationship expressed as $$\vec{u} \cdot \vec{v} = |\vec{u}||\vec{v}|\cos\theta$$. Participants clarify the notation and approach to derive the length of segment AD, which is defined as $$AD = AC \, \cos(\theta)$$. The conversation emphasizes the importance of normalizing vectors and correctly applying the dot product to simplify expressions. Ultimately, the participants confirm the validity of the approach and provide insights into understanding the normalization process.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector notation and operations
  • Familiarity with the dot product and its geometric interpretation
  • Knowledge of trigonometric functions, particularly cosine
  • Ability to manipulate algebraic expressions involving vectors
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the process of vector normalization in detail
  • Learn how to apply the dot product in various geometric contexts
  • Explore the derivation of trigonometric identities related to vectors
  • Investigate applications of orthogonal projection in physics and engineering
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, physics, and engineering who are looking to deepen their understanding of vector projections and the application of dot products in real-world scenarios.

Petrus
Messages
702
Reaction score
0
Hello MHB,
I have hard to prove that AD, I did put on pic the formula for AD and my progress is at bottom.
35l7rzd.png


Regards,
$$|\pi\rangle$$
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Re: orthogonal projection

What is $\vec{u} \cdot \vec{v}$? I object to the notation $\cos(AC)$. You take the cosine of an angle, not the length of a side. Of which angle are you taking the cosine?
 
Re: orthogonal projection

Ackbach said:
What is $\vec{u} \cdot \vec{v}$? I object to the notation $\cos(AC)$. You take the cosine of an angle, not the length of a side. Of which angle are you taking the cosine?
ops i meant $$\cos\theta*AC$$ Is my post unclear what I ask for?

Regards,
$$|\pi\rangle$$
 
Re: orthogonal projection

Petrus said:
ops i meant $$\cos\theta*AC$$ Is my post unclear what I ask for?

Regards,
$$|\pi\rangle$$

No, the post is not unclear. I agree that what you're trying to prove is actually true. I was asking a Socratic question. You should write $AC \, \cos(\theta)$, so that's it's crystal clear what is inside the argument of the cosine, and what is not.

So, let me repeat the question: can you write out what $\vec{u} \cdot \vec{v}$ is?
 
Re: orthogonal projection

Ackbach said:
No, the post is not unclear. I agree that what you're trying to prove is actually true. I was asking a Socratic question. You should write $AC \, \cos(\theta)$, so that's it's crystal clear what is inside the argument of the cosine, and what is not.

So, let me repeat the question: can you write out what $\vec{u} \cdot \vec{v}$ is?
$$u*v=|u||v|\cos\theta$$

Regards,
$$|\pi\rangle$$
 
Re: orthogonal projection

Petrus said:
$$u*v=|u||v|\cos\theta$$

Regards,
$$|\pi\rangle$$

Right. So why don't you use that to simplify the RHS, and see if you get the LHS? Then what could you do?
 
Re: orthogonal projection

Ackbach said:
Right. So why don't you use that to simplify the RHS, and see if you get the LHS? Then what could you do?
Hmm... One quest, could I get to that formula without knowing RHS ( I was more planing to learn how to get to that formula insted of 'memorize' it in exam)

Regards,
$$|\pi\rangle$$
 
Re: orthogonal projection

Ah, I see. Well, here's how I would approach it. Start with a vector in the correct direction, $\vec{u}$. Normalize it by dividing by its length: $\vec{u}/|u|$. Now I have a unit vector (that is, a vector of length $1$), in the direction that I want. The goal is to compute $AD$, and multiply my unit vector by this length $AD$. Now, we know that
$$AD=AC \, \cos( \theta).$$
You'd like to write the RHS using the dot product. So, add in whatever is missing. Can you see how to finish?
 
Re: orthogonal projection

Ackbach said:
Ah, I see. Well, here's how I would approach it. Start with a vector in the correct direction, $\vec{u}$. Normalize it by dividing by its length: $\vec{u}/|u|$. Now I have a unit vector (that is, a vector of length $1$), in the direction that I want. The goal is to compute $AD$, and multiply my unit vector by this length $AD$. Now, we know that
$$AD=AC \, \cos( \theta).$$
You'd like to write the RHS using the dot product. So, add in whatever is missing. Can you see how to finish?
those normalize formula I don't understand how we get it but I understand what it is. I understand exemple $$1=\gamma u$$ then $$\frac{1}{u}= \gamma$$ that is so far I understand about but how do they do after?

so I got:
$$\frac{|v|cos\theta}{|u|}*u$$ then multiplicate both side with |u| and use dot product to write the top as u*v?
is this correct?

Regards
$$|\pi\rangle$$
 
  • #10
Re: orthogonal projection

Petrus said:
those normalize formula I don't understand how we get it but I understand what it is. I understand exemple $$1=\gamma u$$ then $$\frac{1}{u}= \gamma$$ that is so far I understand about but how do they do after?

so I got:
$$\frac{|v|cos\theta}{|u|}*u$$ then multiplicate both side with |u| and use dot product to write the top as u*v?
is this correct?

Regards
$$|\pi\rangle$$

Basically correct, although I wouldn't multiply both sides by $|u|$, but I would multiply the top and bottom by $|u|$. Then you're done.
 
  • #11
Re: orthogonal projection

Ackbach said:
Basically correct, although I wouldn't multiply both sides by $|u|$, but I would multiply the top and bottom by $|u|$. Then you're done.
Thanks for the help and taking your time! Now I see how you got that formula :) Heh i meant top and bottom (Cool)

Regards,
$$|\pi\rangle$$
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K