Calculating Particle Decay Energies in Relativistic Systems

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the decay of a particle with momentum, mass, and energy into two other particles, exploring relativistic effects and energy-momentum conservation. Participants are analyzing the relationships between the energies and momenta of the particles involved in the decay process.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the use of four-momentum and Lorentz transformations to relate different reference frames. Questions arise about the feasibility of solving the problem with the given information, and some participants suggest specific equations to consider.

Discussion Status

The discussion includes various interpretations of the problem, with some participants offering equations and methods for approaching the solution. There is no explicit consensus, but several productive directions are being explored, including the implications of momentum conservation and the relationships between energies in different frames.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note constraints such as the need for specific angles and the assumption of equal and opposite momenta for the outgoing particles. There are also references to the limitations of the information provided in the original problem statement.

Kruger
Messages
213
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A particle with momentum p0, mass m0 and energy E0 decays into two particles with mass m1 and m2. Find the energy of the particle E1 and E2.

Homework Equations



Four-momentum!

The Attempt at a Solution



I calculated the energy of particle 1 in S' (system where particle 0 is at rest) in dependence of m0', m1', m2'. I got also the momentum of the particle 1 in system S' which I can write in dependence of m0', m1', m2' and E1'. For example I have taken the coordinates of system S' in such a way, that I can write the momentum p'1 of particle 1 as: p'1=(0,py',0) with py'=sqrt(f(m0',...)). Thus getting the four-momentum of particle 1: (E', 0, c*py', 0)

Well, what my question concerns. How can I translate the whole thing back into system S? Lorentz-Transformation or is there a easyer way? How can I go on to fullfill the task?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The problem can't be solved as stated. E1 and E2 aren't fixed by knowledge of the initial energy and masses alone.
 
Well, the diffraction angle of p1 relative to p0, the energy E0 and momentum p0 are given as well as the masses m0,m1,m2.
 
So you have an angle between p0 and p1, right? That's different... Then write the four momentum equation (E0,p0)-(E1,p1)=(E2,p2) and square both sides (in the Lorentzian sense). What do you get?
 
Last edited:
Ok, this way I can solve it easy. It is no problem. I want to try it the other way. I mean, I know the solution of the problem in the frame of the moving particle p0 and want to transform it into the lab system (my system).
 
Kruger said:
Ok, this way I can solve it easy. It is no problem. I want to try it the other way. I mean, I know the solution of the problem in the frame of the moving particle p0 and want to transform it into the lab system (my system).

Well then, take a specific solution in the rest frame, like p1 and p2 along the y-axis) and figure out what direction you have to boost into get the required angle. Sounds masochistic to me though.
 
I have a question for solving a similar problem: A particle of mass M at rest decays into two particles of masses m1 and m2. Show that the totatl energy of the first particle is E1 = c(sqr) (M (sqr)+ m1 (sqr) - m(sqr) ) / (2M). and that E2 is obtained by interchanging m1 and m2.
Can you please give me a hint how can I start working it. I know I have to use the energy-momentum 4-vector but do I use only one component for P?
 
Both outgoing particles have the equal and opposite momenta - so you can assume there is only one component if you like. You know E1+E2=M and E^2-p^2=m^2 for each particle. So that's three equations. Eliminate p and E2 to get your expression. You'll have to fill in the c's - I set them to 1.
 
Last edited:
I am still confused with this problem, I have the following equations:
E1+E2=MC^2 .......(1)
E1^2-(p/C)^2=m1^2(C^4)...(2)
E2^2+(p/C)^2=m2^2(C^4)..... (3) [p is equal in magnitude but oppsite in direction]

adding 2 and 3:

E1^2 + E2^2 = ( m1^2 + m2^2) C^4

Plugging the value of E2 from 1 gives a quadratic eguation:

2 E1^2 - 2MC^2 E1 + M^2C^4 = (m1^2 +m2^2 )C^4

Solving this equation doesn't give me the needed answer! Am I doing something wrong?
 
  • #10
(-p/c)^2=(p/c)^2. The square of a negative is positive. You have a flipped sign.
 
  • #11
Oh, I got it now! Thank you so so much!
 
  • #12
I have the following problem: In a collision process a particle of mass m2, at rest in the lab frame is struck by a particle of mass m1 with energy E(L), and momentum P(L). In the centre of mass frame the two particles will have 3-momenta p, and -p respectively. Show that the Lorentz boost parametre B(CM) and describing the velocity of the centre of mass frame in the laboratory is: B(CM) = cP(L)/ (m2c^2+E(L))

I started my solution: B= V(CM)/C
P= [gamma](CM)*m2* V(CM)
E2= [gamma](cm)*m2*c^2
E1= [gamma](cm)*m1*c^2... (not so useful)

now when trying to solve the first the two equations I get:

V(CM)= P*C^2/E2 , this means that E2 = m2c^2+ E(L)! Does this answer make sense? The energy of the second particle in CM frame is equal to total "spatial" energy in Lab frame! How can this be true?
 
  • #13
I don't think you are doing a full lorentz boost, it should look more like this:

\left(\begin{array}{ccc}\gamma&-\beta \gamma\\-\beta \gamma&\gamma\end{array}\right)\left(\begin{array}{c}E\\p\end{array}\right) = \left(\begin{array}{c}E'&p'\end{array}\right)

Apply this to (m2 0) and (EL PL) and set the resulting momenta to be negatives of each other and it's dead simple.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K