Calculating Q for Cylinder with Inhomogeneous E Field

  • Thread starter Thread starter jacobrhcp
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electrostatics
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the charge Q for a cylinder with an inhomogeneous electric field defined by E = E_{0} (r/R)^{3}. Two methods were employed: Gauss's law in integral form and differential form. The integral form yielded Q = 2πe_{0}LE_{0}R, while the differential form resulted in Q = 2πe_{0}E_{0}(3/4)L R. The discrepancy arose from an error in applying the divergence in cylindrical coordinates, specifically in the term (d/dr + 1/r)E_r, which corrected the factor from 3 to 4 in the charge density ρ.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Gauss's Law in electrostatics
  • Familiarity with cylindrical coordinates in vector calculus
  • Knowledge of electric field concepts and charge density
  • Proficiency in differential and integral calculus
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the application of Gauss's Law in various coordinate systems
  • Study the divergence theorem and its implications in electrostatics
  • Learn about electric field calculations in cylindrical geometries
  • Explore advanced topics in electrostatics, such as boundary value problems
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those studying electrostatics, as well as educators seeking to clarify concepts related to electric fields and charge calculations in cylindrical coordinates.

jacobrhcp
Messages
164
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] simple electrostatics problem

Homework Statement



a cylinder, the inhomogenous E field is given by [tex]E = E_{0} (\frac{r}{R})^{3}[/tex]

the assignment was to calculate Q of a piece of the cylinder of length L in two different ways, by gauss law in integral form and in differential form

The Attempt at a Solution



[tex]\oint E dA = \frac{Q}{e_{0}}[/tex]

so [tex]Q = 2\pi e_{0} L E_{0} R[/tex]

the other way around, [tex]\nabla E = \frac{\rho}{e_{0}}[/tex]

so [tex]\rho = e_{0} E_{0} 3 \frac{r^{2}}{R^{3}}[/tex]

so [tex]Q = e_{0} E_{0} 3 \oint \frac{r^{2}}{R^{3}} r dr d\theta dl = 2 \pi e_{0} E_{0} \frac{3}{4} L R[/tex]

which is a factor 3/4 different from my other expression for Q

where did I go wrong?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Review the form of the divergence in cylindrical coordinates. The non-vanishing term is (d/dr+1/r)E_r. That changes your '3' in rho to a '4'.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
12K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K