Calculating Rotational Volume for Enclosed Area by Revolution Around Y-Axis

  • Thread starter Thread starter BadatPhysicsguy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rotation
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the rotational volume of an area enclosed by the curve y=1/x, the positive x-axis, and vertical lines x=1 and x=2, when revolved around the y-axis. The volume is determined using the formula π * ∫ from d to c of x² dx, where the integration limits are established as 1 and 1/2. The final volume is calculated as 2π, derived from the sum of two components: the volume of a large thin cylinder and the volume of the remaining section bounded by y=1/2 and y=1.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of integral calculus, specifically volume of revolution
  • Familiarity with the function y=1/x and its graphical representation
  • Knowledge of the disk method for calculating volumes
  • Ability to perform definite integrals and manipulate limits
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the disk method for calculating volumes of solids of revolution
  • Learn how to set up and evaluate definite integrals in calculus
  • Explore applications of volume calculations in real-world scenarios
  • Investigate alternative methods for volume calculation, such as the shell method
USEFUL FOR

Students studying calculus, particularly those focusing on integral applications in geometry, as well as educators teaching volume calculations for solids of revolution.

BadatPhysicsguy
Messages
39
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


An area is enclosed by y=1/x, the positive x-axis and x=1 and x=2. Determine the volume of the rotational body that is created around the y-axis.

Homework Equations


The formula is pi*integrate from d to c for x^2 dx.

The Attempt at a Solution


Take a look here: http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=y=1/x,+y=0,+x=1,+x=2&a=*C.1-_*NonNegativeDecimalInteger-

I want the rotational volume for the area that is above the the purple, below the blue and between yellow and green. So how do I find the integration "limits" d and c, and what is x^2 in this case?

Okay so the integration points should be 1/x and then I enter x=1 because that is the higher one in the graph, 1/1 = 1. So the upper limit is 1. The lower should be zero, because the problem statement says that it is enclosed by the positive x-axis, y=0. But if I do this, I will also get all of it that is to the right of the green line. If I use 1/2 as my other integration limit, (x=2), there will be a missing rectangle just below.

How do I do this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Imagine seeing the rotated figure from above, it kinda looks like a volcano. Try to make a radius from the origin: one from the O to the yellow line, and one from O to the green line. How long will both of these radii be (as a function of x, then make the substitution y=\frac{1}{x})?
 
6c 6f 76 65 said:
Imagine seeing the rotated figure from above, it kinda looks like a volcano. Try to make a radius from the origin: one from the O to the yellow line, and one from O to the green line. How long will both of these radii be (as a function of x, then make the substitution y=\frac{1}{x})?
Hello and thank you for another answer. Tell me if I'm understanding this correctly. So looking from above, I see a volcano. From above, the radius of the "hole" is from x=0 to x=1? The part between yellow and green is the "rock" part of the volcano and then there is a steep fall from the edge of the green side down to the ground.

How do I express the radius as a function of x? Now with the volcano explanation my first instinct is that I want the total volume of the volcano minus the "cylinder" that is the hole. So the radius from the volcano hole to the first rock part (yellow) is 1. The volume of the cylinder is then 3.14(pi)*1^2*height. The height is as high as the yellow goes, 1. So the volume of the cylinder is simply 3.14 volume units.

Now what is the total volume of the volcano? That is where I hit a problem again. Because if I integrate from 1 to 0 "the bottom" the volcano doesn't have a steep fall, instead the foundation continues to infinity.
 
BadatPhysicsguy said:
Hello and thank you for another answer. Tell me if I'm understanding this correctly. So looking from above, I see a volcano. From above, the radius of the "hole" is from x=0 to x=1? The part between yellow and green is the "rock" part of the volcano and then there is a steep fall from the edge of the green side down to the ground.

How do I express the radius as a function of x? Now with the volcano explanation my first instinct is that I want the total volume of the volcano minus the "cylinder" that is the hole. So the radius from the volcano hole to the first rock part (yellow) is 1. The volume of the cylinder is then 3.14(pi)*1^2*height. The height is as high as the yellow goes, 1. So the volume of the cylinder is simply 3.14 volume units.

Now what is the total volume of the volcano? That is where I hit a problem again. Because if I integrate from 1 to 0 "the bottom" the volcano doesn't have a steep fall, instead the foundation continues to infinity.

Seems like you're heading in the right direction! As you creatively thought removing the cylinder is the key, now in order to compute the whole volume divide it into:
- The volume of the "large thin cylinder", bounded by x=0, x=2, y=\frac{1}{2} (is the radius constant here?)
- The volume of the remaining part bounded by y=\frac{1}{2}, y=1 and y=\frac{1}{x} (is the radius constant here?)

EDIT: Maybe I caused some confusion when talking about the "radius", here I mean the length from the y-axis to where it meets some boundary
 
Last edited:
6c 6f 76 65 said:
Seems like you're heading in the right direction! As you creatively thought removing the cylinder is the key, now in order to compute the whole volume divide it into:
- The volume of the "large thin cylinder", bounded by x=0, x=2, y=\frac{1}{2} (is the radius constant here?)
- The volume of the remaining part bounded by y=\frac{1}{2}, y=1 and y=\frac{1}{x} (is the radius constant here?)

Hm, so the volume of the "large thin cylinder" is simple geometry, right? The radius is 2 (from 0->2) and the height is 1/2. So that would be 2^2*pi*1/2. So 2*pi or approx 6.28 is the total bottom part.

As for the remaining part, I have to integrate. It must be expressed as x^2, so yx=1 => 1/y=x and then square it => x^2=1/y^2. Pi*integrate from 1 to 1/2 for 1/y^2 gives 1*pi volume units.

So I have the part bounded by y=1/2 and y=1 and y=1/x that is 1*pi volume units. The part just below it is 2*pi but that includes a chunk of the hole. So I want to remove the chunk that has radius 1, height 1/2. That is 1^2 * 3.14 * 1/2 so half a pi. 3*pi-0.5*pi is 2.5*pi. But the answer is 2*pi. Either I have added half a pi too much somewhere, calculated wrong from the very start or forgot to remove half a pi. What am I missing?

Also, is there no single "easy" way to calculate this? Or does the calculation have to be divided?
 
BadatPhysicsguy said:
Hm, so the volume of the "large thin cylinder" is simple geometry, right? The radius is 2 (from 0->2) and the height is 1/2. So that would be 2^2*pi*1/2. So 2*pi or approx 6.28 is the total bottom part.
Correct!

BadatPhysicsguy said:
As for the remaining part, I have to integrate. It must be expressed as x^2, so yx=1 => 1/y=x and then square it => x^2=1/y^2. Pi*integrate from 1 to 1/2 for 1/y^2 gives 1*pi volume units.
Correct!
BadatPhysicsguy said:
So I have the part bounded by y=1/2 and y=1 and y=1/x that is 1*pi volume units. The part just below it is 2*pi but that includes a chunk of the hole. So I want to remove the chunk that has radius 1, height 1/2. That is 1^2 * 3.14 * 1/2 so half a pi.
Almost correct, what is the height of the "inner cylinder"?

BadatPhysicsguy said:
Also, is there no single "easy" way to calculate this?
Well, you can make it a little simpler by saying the volume you're interested in finding is composed by:
- Volume bounded by: x=1, x=2, y=0, y=\frac{1}{2} then get V_1=\pi\int_0^\frac{1}{2} (2^2-1^2)dy = \frac{3\pi}{2}
- Volume bounded by: x=1, x=2, y=\frac{1}{2}, y=\frac{1}{x} then get V_2=\pi\int_\frac{1}{2}^1 \frac{1}{y^2}-1^2 dy = \frac{\pi}{2}
V_1+V_2=2\pi, but I'm not sure whether you can compute it without decomposing it.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K