Calculating Statistical Operator $\hat{\rho}$

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter matematikuvol
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Operator Statistical
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 3K views
matematikuvol
Messages
190
Reaction score
0
[tex] \hat{\rho} = \begin{bmatrix}<br /> \frac{1}{3} & 0 & 0 \\[0.3em]<br /> 0 & \frac{1}{3} & 0 \\[0.3em]<br /> 0 & 0 & \frac{1}{3} <br /> \end{bmatrix}[/tex]

If I have this statistical operator I get
[tex]i\hbar\frac{d\hat{\rho}}{dt}=0[/tex]
So this is integral of motion and
[tex][\hat{H},\hat{\rho}]=0[/tex]
Is this correct? Tnx for your answer.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your operator is a constant multiple of the identity operator, so it commutes with any operator, in particular the Hamiltonian.
 
Of course. My example wasn't so good. Suppose I have matrix

[tex] \hat{\rho} = \begin{bmatrix}<br /> \frac{1}{3} & 5 & 6 \\[0.3em]<br /> 5 & \frac{1}{3} & 6 \\[0.3em]<br /> 5 & 6 & \frac{1}{3} <br /> \end{bmatrix}[/tex]

Why now [tex]\hat{\rho}[/tex] always commute with Hamiltonian?
 
Last edited:
What you have written is the state ρ in a fixed base for a given time t0.

Compare this with a ket vector, which can be represented as a column vector (1 2 3 ...)T for any fixed time t0.

In both cases, the states are initial values for the dynamical equations. Not their solutions for all times t.