Calculating Sun's Speed and Movement: A Query on Theories of Light

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter alankar
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Speed
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the time it would take for a person standing on one side of a hill to see the sun rise on the opposite side. The scenario involves a semicircular hill with a specified arc length and considers various factors affecting visibility, including the height of the observer and the position of the sun.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • Alankar poses a question about the time it takes for the sun to become visible to a person standing at the base of a semicircular hill with a 4KM arc.
  • Some participants suggest that additional information is needed, such as the height of the person's eyes and their distance from the hill.
  • One participant mentions that the time of year and latitude are important for determining the sun's path, indicating that conditions can vary significantly.
  • Another participant proposes making simplifying assumptions, such as the height of the person and the time of year, to facilitate calculations.
  • Alankar clarifies assumptions regarding the observer's height and location, including specific dates and geographical coordinates.
  • Some participants note contradictions in Alankar's assumptions, suggesting that clarity is needed for a mathematical solution.
  • There is a suggestion that participants may not provide direct calculations but can assist with guidance if Alankar encounters difficulties.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that more information is necessary to arrive at a solution, but there are competing views on the assumptions that should be made. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the exact calculations needed.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the need for specific assumptions to be made clear, as well as the potential for varying conditions based on geographical and temporal factors. There is also mention of the possibility of different scenarios based on the observer's height.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for individuals interested in mathematical modeling of physical scenarios, particularly those involving geometry and the movement of celestial bodies.

alankar
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I have a peculiar query, including theories of light, Sun's speed and movement. Following is the query :

Imagine there is a hill like a half circle and sun is rising on a side of hill, on the opposite side there is a person standing waiting to see sun, as sun moves up in the sky. The hill's arc (half circle's perimeter) is 4KM. Could there be any calculation so that we know after sun rise how much time it would take so that Sun could be seen by the person standing on the other side of hill?

Waiting for any kind of help in this, Thanks in advance for your replies.

Thanks,
Alankar
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
I'm confident it can be worked out mathematically, but only if you give enough information for there to be a solution.

How far along are you in math? You have left out some very fundamental factors.

For example:

(1) How far are the person's eyes from the ground?
(2) How far away from the hill is the person standing?
 
phinds said:
I'm confident it can be worked out mathematically, but only if you give enough information for there to be a solution.

How far along are you in math? You have left out some very fundamental factors.

For example:

(1) How far are the person's eyes from the ground?
(2) How far away from the hill is the person standing?

You would probably also need to know the latitude and what time of year, to know the sun's path across the sky. If it's an antarctic winter, the answer could be months, to give one extreme.
 
You have not said how tall the person is---how high his eyes are, from the ground.

If he is as big as an ant, so his eyes are right at ground level, and if he is right at place where the semicircular arc of the hill comes down to the flat ground, then he will be in shadow for a long time---perhaps until nearly noon. For an ant right next to the hill, the hill makes a big shadow.

A semicircle arc, where it meets the flat level, is almost vertical. It looks like a huge vertical wall to the ant, and he is right next to the base of the wall. So the size of the person matters.

Also keep in mind that the sun does not always appear to rise straight up from the horizon. At different times of year it can seem to rise and set along a slanted path.

To solve the problem, you might consider making simplifying assumptions.

Like for example suppose the man is 2 meters tall . Then his height is 1/2000 of the length of the hill's arc, which you say is 4000 meters. Say that it is the Spring Equinox and the man lives on the Equator, like in Singapore. So then the sun will rise straight up perpendicular from the horizon and it will rise 90 degrees in the first 6 hours of the day----so it will rise 15 degrees each hour. It takes 4 minutes to move 1 degree.

If this is a homework problem, for school, then you should go to the homework section of Physicsforums.

They will probably suggest that you make explicit some simplifying assumptions, like what I suggested. Then, with those assumptions, you will learn how to solve the problem.

===================

EDIT: After posting this, I saw that PHinds and Jack had already covered all or most of the points here. Didn't see your posts. Sorry about simply repeating.
 
Last edited:
I will show you what comes of the simplifying assumptions that I mentioned. If the man is 2 meters tall (or his eyes are 2 meters off the ground) and he stands right next to the base of the hill, what angle does he make? One quadrant, 90 degrees, of the arc of the hill is 2000 meters. His height is 1/1000 of that.

I think his height represents 90 degrees divided by 1000. That is 9/100 of one degree.
His line of sight, looking up the side of the hill, must be nearly vertical, but not quite vertical. It must be slanted from vertical by 9/100 of one degree to the east.

That comes of assuming that his eyelevel height is 2 meters. You would want to make some more realistic assumption, but that gives a sample of what can be expected.
 
marcus said:
You have not said how tall the person is---how high his eyes are, from the ground.

Hm ... wonder why I didn't think of that.
 
phinds said:
Hm ... wonder why I didn't think of that.

Obviously you did think of it :biggrin:
I took a long time writing my post and did not see that two other people had responded before me. You and the other poster raised all the points before I did.

Maybe I should edit my post to acknowledge.
 
Last edited:
marcus said:
Obviously you did think of it :biggrin:
I took a long time writing my post and did not see that two other people had responded before me. You and the other poster raised all the points before I did.

Maybe I should edit my post to acknowledge.

Marcus you make so many posts here that it amazes me that you EVER have time to read previous posts in the threads. I was just having some fun at your expense.

Thanks for all the effort you put in here. Very helpful to newbies such as me.
 
phinds said:
I'm confident it can be worked out mathematically, but only if you give enough information for there to be a solution.

How far along are you in math? You have left out some very fundamental factors.

For example:

(1) How far are the person's eyes from the ground?
(2) How far away from the hill is the person standing?
Hi !

Thanks for replies and further queries. I am assuming following :

1) The person's eye is at ground (neglecting his height).
2) The person's eye is at 180 cm above the ground.
3) The person is just touching the semi-circle arc.
4) The day, I am assuming is 23rd of March.
5) Person is at equator (0 degree Latitude) and 0 degree Longitude. (Whether possible or not).
6) The person is looking towards the hill (top of it).
7) If the arc is reduced to 3KM than what would be the change in time?

The question I am asking is not for any kind of school curriculum. I am doing some research work and for that I am looking for help. If there is any other more suitable forum then please tell me.

I hope I'll get some satisfactory resolutions now.

Thanks everyone.

Alankar
 
Last edited:
  • #10
your items 1 and 2 are mutually contradictory.

Still, given one of those, I think you have now specifed enough information that it can be worked out mathematically.

If you are expecting someone here to actually DO the math for you, you're likely to be disappointed. If you want an actual numerical answer, then start working on it and ask questinos if/when you get stuck.
 
  • #11
phinds said:
your items 1 and 2 are mutually contradictory.

Still, given one of those, I think you have now specifed enough information that it can be worked out mathematically.

If you are expecting someone here to actually DO the math for you, you're likely to be disappointed. If you want an actual numerical answer, then start working on it and ask questinos if/when you get stuck.

Hi,

I was writing item 1,2 and 7 as different situations.

Phinds, if I would know how to do the calculation, I was not asking a question here. This is not due to my laziness, but I don't know how to solve it. Anyway, if this is the last word then could anyone please direct me to a suitable forum?

Thanks for at least looking into it.

Alankar
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 142 ·
5
Replies
142
Views
140K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
827
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K