Calculating the amplitude that a particle is spin up

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the amplitude of a spin 1/2 particle being in the spin-up state, independent of its spatial position. Participants explore the mathematical formulation of this concept, including the relationship between amplitudes and probabilities, and the implications of coherence in the wavefunction.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that the amplitude for a spin-up state can be expressed as an integral over the spatial wavefunction, specifically ∫ ψ_{+}(x,t) d^3 x.
  • Others argue that this approach does not yield a meaningful amplitude, suggesting that it is more appropriate to calculate the probability of the spin-up state using ∫ |ψ_{+}(x,t)|² d^3 x.
  • A later reply questions the validity of defining an amplitude independent of position, stating that it generally does not make sense to do so.
  • One participant mentions that in quantum computation contexts, amplitudes are often considered without regard to position, citing examples from NMR.
  • Another participant suggests that if ψ_{+}(x) has a constant phase across space, a sensible amplitude could be defined as e^{i φ} √(∫ d^3 x |ψ_{+}(x)|²), but cautions that without coherence, defining such an amplitude is problematic.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on whether it is valid to define an amplitude for the spin-up state independent of position. Some support the idea under certain conditions, while others maintain that it is not meaningful in general.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the dependence on the coherence of the wavefunction and the mathematical distinctions between amplitudes and probabilities. There is uncertainty regarding the appropriate formulations and interpretations of these concepts.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those studying quantum mechanics, particularly in the context of spin systems, wavefunctions, and quantum computation.

dEdt
Messages
286
Reaction score
2
The wavefunction for a spin 1/2 particle is a spinor field of the form \psi(\mathbf{x},t)=\left( <br /> \begin{array}{cc} <br /> \psi_{+}(\mathbf{x},t)\\ <br /> \psi_{-}(\mathbf{x},t)<br /> \end{array} <br /> \right).
\psi_{+}(\mathbf{x},t) is the amplitude that the particle is both spin up and located at position x at time t. How can I calculate the amplitude that the particle is just spin up, without any regards for its position? Would it be something like
\int \psi_{+}(\mathbf{x,t})d^3 \mathbf{x}?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
dEdt said:
The wavefunction for a spin 1/2 particle is a spinor field of the form \psi(\mathbf{x},t)=\left( <br /> \begin{array}{cc} <br /> \psi_{+}(\mathbf{x},t)\\ <br /> \psi_{-}(\mathbf{x},t)<br /> \end{array} <br /> \right).
\psi_{+}(\mathbf{x},t) is the amplitude that the particle is both spin up and located at position x at time t. How can I calculate the amplitude that the particle is just spin up, without any regards for its position? Would it be something like
\int \psi_{+}(\mathbf{x,t})d^3 \mathbf{x}?

Here is what I thought of

|\Psi\rangle = |\psi\rangle\otimes|\alpha\rangle

The completeness should lead to
\int dx |x\rangle\langle x| \otimes \left(|\uparrow\rangle\langle \uparrow |+ |\downarrow\rangle\langle \downarrow |\right) = \mathbb{I}

Thus we have the expansion
\left[\int dx |x\rangle\langle x| \otimes \left(|\uparrow\rangle\langle \uparrow |+ |\downarrow\rangle\langle \downarrow |\right)\right] |\Psi\rangle = \int dx \langle x|\psi\rangle |x\rangle \otimes \left(\langle \uparrow |\alpha\rangle |\uparrow\rangle + \langle \downarrow |\alpha\rangle |\downarrow\rangle\right)

Take the inner product with spin up state vector. [I don't know if this is valid]
\langle \uparrow |\Psi\rangle = \int dx \langle x|\psi\rangle \langle \uparrow |\alpha\rangle |x\rangle

The norm of this should give us the desired number but this number can be obtained by taking inner product of |\psi\rangle\otimes |\uparrow\rangle with the state vector written in first equation.

I am myself confused. How do we write \psi_{+} in form of innerproduct?
Can we write
<br /> \psi_{+} = \langle x|\psi\rangle \langle \uparrow |\alpha\rangle ?<br />
 
Last edited:
Mentors... advisors ...
any correction/suggestion will be helpful :)

I think the correct answer is (in terms of probability)
\int |\psi_{+}(\mathbf{x,t})|^2d^3 \mathbf{x}
I want to know if the mathematics I have done is correct. Thanks
 
dEdt said:
How can I calculate the amplitude that the particle is just spin up, without any regards for its position?

There's no such quantity. You can calculate the *probability* that the particle is spin-up without regards for its position, and your expression for this probability in #3 is correct. But in general it doesn't make sense to talk about the *amplitude* for the particle to be spin-up, regardless of position. You can't just do ##\int d^3 x \psi_+(x)## because squaring this will not give you the correct probability that you wrote down in #3.
 
The_Duck said:
But in general it doesn't make sense to talk about the *amplitude* for the particle to be spin-up, regardless of position.
In quantum computation we do it all the time. We don't care at what position our nucleus is (in case of NMR) but we do care about the amplitudes of nucleus in spin up and down states.
 
Sure, I think it makes sense to define such an amplitude if ##\psi_+(x)## has essentially the same phase everywhere in space. Then I think we can define a sensible amplitude ##e^{i \phi} \sqrt{\int d^3 x |\psi_+ (x)|^2}## where ##e^{i \phi}## is the constant global phase of ##\psi_+(x)##. But if ##\psi_+(x)## is not coherent in this way I don't think you can define an amplitude to be spin up independent of position. We are tracing out the position degree of freedom and we end up with a density matrix, whose entries are probabilities and not amplitudes.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K