Calculating the Commutator of x and p - Problem Discussion

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter lihurricane
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Commutator
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the calculation of the commutator of position (x) and momentum (p) operators in quantum mechanics, specifically addressing the expression [x, p] = iħ. Participants explore the implications of this commutator and the calculations involved, with a focus on the eigenstates of the momentum operator.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant claims to have derived a result of zero from their calculations involving the commutator, but seeks clarification on potential errors.
  • Another participant questions the validity of the calculations, suggesting that the results depend on how is computed and warns against misapplying mathematical theorems without considering their assumptions.
  • A third participant references another thread for additional context and suggests looking at specific posts for further insights.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not appear to reach a consensus, as there are competing views on the correctness of the calculations and the interpretation of the results.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of missing assumptions in the calculations, and the discussion highlights the dependence on how certain expressions are evaluated, which may lead to different interpretations or results.

lihurricane
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
i have met a problem about the commutator of x and p.
[x,p]=ihbar

/p> is the eigenstate of momentum operator p.

<p/xp-px/p>

=<p/xp/p>-<p/px/p>

=p<p/x/p>-p<p/x/p> the second term is got by the momentum operator p acting on
the left state.

=0

so i get zero! is there anyone can point out where i am wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you calculate <p|x|p>? Which number will you get? I can tell you: any number you want, depending on how you decide to calculate it. You are playing pseudo-math with formal expressions without really understanding their mathematical meaning. That is how many paradoxes appear.

Many theorems in mathematics are valid under certain assumptions. Skip the assumptions, apply the theorem, and you can well create a paradox.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
16K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K