Let x(u,v) be a coordinate patch. Define a new patch by y(u, v) = c x (u, v) where c is a constant. Show that [itex] K_y = \frac {1}{c^2}K_x [/itex] where [itex] K_x [/itex] is the gaussian curvature calculated using x(u, v) and [itex] K_y [/itex] is the gaussian curvature calculated using y(u, v).(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

my book expects us to use the formulas [itex] K = \frac {ln-m^2}{EG-F^2} [/itex] where [itex] E = x_u \cdot x_u, F = x_u \cdot x_v, G = x_v \cdot x_v, l = S(x_v) \dot x_v, m = S(x_u)\cdot x_v, n = S(x_v)\cdot x_v [/itex].

where S is the shape operator.

i can see that [itex] y_u = c x_u [/itex] and [itex] y_{uu} = c x_{uu} [/itex]. so i tried calculating [itex] l = S(y_u) \cdot y_u = S(cx_u) \cdot x_u = c^2 S(x_u) \cdot x_u [/itex]. but a result from my book states that [itex] S(x_u) \cdot x_u = U \cdot x_{uu} [/itex] where U is the unit vector created by taking the cross product [itex] x_u \times x_v [/itex] and dividing by its length. when calculated this way, i get that [itex] U \cdot y_{uu} = c(U \cdot x_{uu}) = c(S(x_u) \cdot x_u)) [/itex]

but this seems contradictory since i got [itex] c^2 S(x_u) \cdot x_u [/itex] earlier and now i only get one factor of c even though the 2 are supposed to be equal. i am confused on what is going on here. help will be greatly appreciated.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Calculating the gaussian curvature of a surface

Loading...

Similar Threads - Calculating gaussian curvature | Date |
---|---|

I On the Gaussian Curvature of time-like surfaces | Dec 20, 2017 |

Calculating mixed partial derivatives on a 3D mesh | Oct 15, 2015 |

Component of vector parallel to boundary while calculating divergence | Nov 5, 2013 |

Calculating reciprocal base vectors | Oct 17, 2013 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**