Calculating the gravitational accelleration on the surface of a planet

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the gravitational acceleration on the surface of a planet, specifically Earth. Participants explore the relationship between gravitational force and acceleration, the impact of Earth's shape and rotation on gravitational measurements, and the implications for expressing gravitational acceleration values.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions why the gravitational acceleration formula derived from the law of universal gravitation does not directly yield the expected acceleration on Earth's surface.
  • Another participant asserts that using the correct values leads to an acceleration of approximately 9.8 m/s².
  • A different participant confirms a calculated value of g as 9.79 m/s², noting that for greater accuracy, the non-uniform density of Earth should be considered.
  • A participant admits to a previous error in unit conversion, leading to a miscalculation of gravitational acceleration.
  • A new question is raised regarding the variation of gravitational acceleration due to Earth's equatorial bulge, suggesting it may range from 9.77 m/s² to 9.83 m/s².
  • Another participant agrees that gravitational acceleration varies, attributing this variation to Earth's rotation speed, which is higher at the equator and zero at the poles.
  • This participant also discusses the implications of expressing gravitational acceleration with more precision, suggesting that location specificity would be necessary if more digits were used.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that gravitational acceleration varies based on location on Earth due to factors like shape and rotation. However, there is no consensus on the exact values or the extent of variation.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention the need to consider Earth's non-spherical shape and varying density for accurate calculations, as well as the influence of rotation on gravitational measurements. These factors introduce complexity and uncertainty in determining a singular value for gravitational acceleration.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students and enthusiasts interested in gravitational physics, planetary science, and the mathematical modeling of gravitational forces.

dimensionless
Messages
461
Reaction score
1
Why doesn't this force give the gravitational acceleration on the surface of the earth?

[tex]a = G \cdot \frac{m}{r^2}[/tex]

I would think that it could be derived from the law of universal gravitation:

[tex]F = G \cdot \frac{m_1 \cdot m_2}{r^2}[/tex]

Since [tex]F = m_2 a[/tex]
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
When you put in the right numbers, the accelaration should come to around 9.8ms^-2.
 
It does. I get g = 9.79 m/s^2 using your formula and accepted data for the mass and radius of the Earth.

For more accuracy, the fact the density of the Earth is not spherically symmetric has to be taken into account.
 
It seems I screwed my units up. I had 9.77e6 m/s^2. I should have had 9.77 m/s^2.

New question:

The Earth's radius is larger at the equator that from pole to pole. Does the acceleration due to gravity vary from, say, 9.77 m/s^2 to 9.83 m/s^2?
 
Yes, and it also varies because the velocity from Earth's rotation is higher at the equator, and 0 at the poles. This adds to the effect.

This is also probably the reason that you don't see g expressed as more digits. If instead of calling it 9.8 you called it 9.81756423, then you'd have to specify where on Earth you were talking about.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
1K