Calculating the Ksp of Calcium hydroxide at room temp

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the calculation of the solubility product constant (Ksp) of calcium hydroxide (Ca(OH)2) based on a titration experiment. Participants explore potential sources of error in the experimental setup and results, particularly focusing on discrepancies between the calculated Ksp and the accepted value.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • The calculated Ksp of 3.0 x10^-7 is significantly lower than the accepted value of 5.02 x10^-6, resulting in a high percent error of 94%.
  • Possible errors considered include the temperature being lower than 25 degrees and improper filtration of the Ca(OH)2 solution.
  • Participants question the precision of the KHP measurement and the drying process before use, as well as the indicator used in the titration.
  • One participant suggests that the Ca(OH)2 solution may have been partially neutralized by CO2, which could affect the titration results.
  • Another participant posits that if the solution was indeed partially neutralized, it would be less basic, requiring more Ca(OH)2 to reach the endpoint, thus leading to a lower calculated Ksp.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express uncertainty regarding the reasons for the large deviation in the calculated Ksp. While some agree that partial neutralization by CO2 could explain the results, there is no consensus on the extent of its impact or other potential errors.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the potential influence of temperature on Ksp values, the effects of CO2 on the Ca(OH)2 solution, and the accuracy of the titration procedure. The discussion does not resolve these uncertainties.

Who May Find This Useful

Students and educators involved in chemistry experiments, particularly those focusing on titration methods and solubility product calculations, may find this discussion relevant.

Zoey Brown
Messages
17
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I conducted a titration experiment in which 0.1g of KHP was dissolved in 50mL of distilled water and placed in an Erlenmeyer flask. I filtered a Ca(OH)2 solution (that was left out open on the lab benches for us to use) and put that into the burette and titrated. Ultimately, the Ksp i calculated was 3.0 x10^-7 whereas the accepted Ksp value is 5.02 x10^-6. This gave me a percent error of 94%. I'm not as concerned about the fact that i got a huge error as much as i don't understand why. Some of the possible errors i can think of are that the temperature was cooler than 25 degrees and that the solution wasnt filtered properly. The issue is that both of those errors would have caused higher Ksp values than the accepted, not lower like mine.

Homework Equations


c=n/V
Ksp= [Ca 2+][OH -]^2

The Attempt at a Solution


I know that if my Ksp is lower, my concentrations must be lower which means i used too much calcium hydroxide. i don't know why however
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How precisely was the KHP weighted? Was it correctly dried before use? What indicator was used?
 
the KHP was measured exactly each trial, all proper titration procedures were followed, and phenolphthalein was used. However, in any case i doubt such errors would result in such a large deviation from the theoretical value
 
Separately not, but they could combine producing a larger error than expected.

If the solution was left in the open it was partially neutralized by CO2 before you started the titration.
 
So if the solution was partially neutralized by carbon dioxide, would that mean that it was less basic and therefore more of the calcium hydroxide solution would have to be used in order for it to be standardized by the KHP? And that would be a cause for the increase in volume used, which decreases concentration, and creates a lowe Ksp than the theoretical value?
 
Yes.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
13K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
10K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
39K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
11
Views
10K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
10K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
64K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
10K