Calculating the latitude/longitude from known distance

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Ben Arnold
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Latitude Longitude
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around calculating latitude and longitude from a known point based on small distances traveled north and east, specifically under the 'flat earth' assumption. Participants explore the implications of this assumption and the mathematical relationships involved in such calculations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant inquires about calculating latitude and longitude using known distances in ΔN (north) and ΔE (east) under the flat earth assumption.
  • Another participant seeks clarification on what ΔN and ΔE represent.
  • A participant explains that a displacement of 10m north corresponds to a change in latitude of 10/1852 minutes, while the change in longitude is more complex and depends on the latitude.
  • One participant expresses a desire for a simple method to calculate latitude and longitude from a known point, emphasizing their newness to the topic.
  • Another participant suggests that the flat earth assumption allows for treating the triangle formed by the distances as a regular triangle, which is reasonable for small distances away from the poles.
  • A participant asks for clarification on the specific deltas corresponding to changes in latitude and longitude.
  • One participant describes their setup for testing a tracking unit's dead reckoning capabilities, detailing how they plan to measure distances and compare them with the device's readout.
  • A participant references a previous thread for additional context on converting distances to angular measures for latitude and longitude.
  • Another participant mentions a simple approximation for changes in latitude and longitude based on spherical coordinates, noting the proportionality of changes in north/south and east/west directions.
  • A participant points to a link that explains how to determine the length of a degree of longitude at various latitudes, suggesting that for small distances, Cartesian geometry can be applied.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various viewpoints on the flat earth assumption and its implications for calculations, with no consensus reached on the best method or the definitions of ΔN and ΔE.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved questions regarding the definitions of ΔN and ΔE, the applicability of the flat earth assumption, and the specific mathematical relationships involved in converting distances to latitude and longitude.

Ben Arnold
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
For a small distance (in the range of 10's of metres) how can I calculate the latitude/longitude of a point if I know the distance in ΔN and ΔE from a known latitude/longitude using the 'flat earth' assumption?

Thanks in advance :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What are ΔN and ΔE?
 
For the latitude is easier. One minute is approximately one nautical mile, 1852 m. So your displacement of 10m N (let's say) will corespond to 10/1852 minutes change in latitude. The change in longitude is trickier. It depends on the latitude. One minute of longitude is approximately one nautical mile along the equator but decreases as you approach the pole. Still not too hard a problem if you draw a diagram.

What is the flat Earth assumption? How do you define degrees of latitude and longitude in this assumption?
 
I'm basically looking at a simple way of calculating the latitude and longitude of a point from a known datum point, with distance traveled north and east known (from the azimuth and total distance travelled, using Pythagoras). It will be a relatively small distance so I've read you can use a 'flat earth' assumption? Sorry I'm very new to this.
 
Can you provide a reference? Where have you read this?
 
I think all the "flat earth" assumption means in this case is that the triangle you will calculate will be a regular triangle, not one with an arc on one side. A reasonable assumption provided you're not close to the poles and your deltas are small.
 
Aye, basically what I'm asking is what deltas would correspond to what change in long/lat roughly? I'll dig up the source now.
 
Then what are these deltas? The distance traveled to North and South? You also mentioned azimuth.
 
I've got a basic grid set up over an area of roughly 100m x 100m with y direction being north and x direction being east, I'm testing the dead reckoning capabilities of a tracking unit so will have a read out in long/lat from the device after a certain period of time of movement. I plan on measuring the distance traveled in the y (north) and x(East) direction using a laser measuring device from a known datum and compare it with the readout. Using the distance and azimuth I can use basic trig to work out the north and east components, and wondered if there was a way of converting the distances to a new longitude and latitude and comparing it with what the tracking device is telling me.
 
  • #11
  • #12
This link tells you what you need to know. The section on the length of a degree longitude shows you how to work out what it is for any particular latitude. For a small range of distances, such as you want, you can treat the geometry as Cartesian (x,y) with the x scaled according to the angle of lattitude.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
11K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K