Calculating the Mass of a High-Speed Moving Proton Experimentally

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter steph17
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass Proton
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the experimental calculation of the mass of a high-speed moving proton, specifically addressing the concept of relativistic mass and its implications in particle physics. Participants explore the definitions and measurements involved in determining mass in the context of relativistic effects.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that the mass of a proton does not depend on its motion, emphasizing that "mass" refers to rest mass.
  • Others introduce the term "relativistic mass," acknowledging its deprecated status but suggesting it may still be relevant in certain contexts, particularly in high-energy physics.
  • A participant mentions that in the Large Hadron Collider (LHC), the proton's "mass" must include relativistic corrections for accurate calculations.
  • There is a suggestion that the term "calculated experimentally" is ambiguous, and participants express a desire to clarify the original question before proceeding.
  • One participant proposes that relativistic mass can be verified experimentally by measuring the force exerted by the proton or changes in its momentum.
  • Another participant explains that energy measurements are crucial, noting that the deflection in dipole magnets is dependent on energy, which must be controlled precisely to prevent protons from crashing into the collider walls.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express disagreement regarding the relevance and definition of relativistic mass, with some advocating for its use while others argue against it. The discussion remains unresolved, particularly concerning the interpretation of the original question and the implications of relativistic effects on mass.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the discussion regarding the definitions of mass and the assumptions underlying the use of relativistic mass. The conversation also reflects a lack of consensus on the terminology and its implications in experimental physics.

steph17
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
how is a mass of a proton moving at a high speed calculated experimentally?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
steph17 said:
how is a mass of a proton moving at a high speed calculated experimentally?
"calculated" is not the same as "experimentally". Which are you asking about?

EDIT: damn. I did what I frequently do. You have said "proton" and I saw it as "photon"
 
Last edited:
There is nothing to calculate, the mass of a proton does not depend on its motion
 
mfb said:
There is nothing to calculate, the mass of a proton does not depend on its motion
I'm assuming he's referring to "relativistic mass". And yes I know that's a seriously deprecated term which is why I put it in quotes, but I don't know what else to call it. Momentum, perhaps?

OOPS: I see now he's talking about protons, not photons. Forget I said anything o:)
 
Last edited:
In the LHC the proton "mass" must include the relativistic correction to make it work.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: steph17
The concept of relativistic mass was used decades ago, then scientists got rid of it because it just leads to weird consequences without helping anywhere.
"Mass" now always means "rest mass" and does not depend on the motion of the object.

@mathman: No. You just need energy, momentum, the fixed proton mass of ~938 MeV and relativistic mechanics.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: steph17
Rather than turning this into a discussion on what we think the OP means, wouldn't it be better to wait for the follow-up? "Calculated experimentally" makes no sense, so let's see what is actually meant.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: steph17
i do mean the relativistic mass, there is a formula for the correction of mass for proton or some other particle moving at velocity comparable to that of the light's, how is it verified experimentally? do they measure the force exerted by the proton in some way or change in its momentum and thereby calculate the mass?
 
mfb said:
The concept of relativistic mass was used decades ago, then scientists got rid of it because it just leads to weird consequences without helping anywhere.
"Mass" now always means "rest mass" and does not depend on the motion of the object.
i didnt know that
 
  • #10
They measure the energy - the deflection in the dipole magnets depends on the energy and you have to control it very precisely otherwise the protons crash into the inner or outer wall - the protons follow a ring with a diameter of about 8 km, and a deviation of 1 cm would mean they get lost.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: steph17

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K