Calculating the statistical properties of the given PDF

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on calculating statistical properties such as the characteristic function, mean, and variance from a given probability density function (PDF), specifically a uniform distribution represented as ##p(x) = 1/2b##. The characteristic function is defined as ##\phi(t)=\int_R e^{itx}f(x)dx##, while moments are calculated using ##m_k=\int_R x^kf(x)dx## and variance is derived from the relationship ##\text{variance} = m_2 - m_1^2##. The conversation highlights the confusion around notation and the application of Fourier transforms in deriving these properties.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of probability density functions (PDFs)
  • Familiarity with characteristic functions and their definitions
  • Knowledge of statistical moments and variance calculations
  • Basic principles of Fourier transforms
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of characteristic functions from various types of PDFs
  • Explore the relationship between Fourier transforms and statistical properties
  • Learn about the implications of convolution in the context of probability distributions
  • Review advanced statistical textbooks that cover Fourier analysis in depth
USEFUL FOR

Statisticians, data scientists, and students studying probability theory who need to understand the mathematical foundations of statistical properties derived from PDFs.

Arman777
Insights Author
Gold Member
Messages
2,163
Reaction score
191
For instance if we are given only a PDF in the form of ##p(x)##, how can one calculate the characteristic function, the mean, and the variance of these PDF's ?

Any site or explanation will be enough for me
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There are standard formulas given pdf ##f(x)##. Char. fcn. ##\phi(t)=\int_R e^{itx}f(x)dx##, moments ##m_k=\int_R x^kf(x)dx##, variance ##=m_2-m_1^2##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Arman777
Arman777 said:
Any site or explanation
A textbook on statistics ?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Arman777
Okay I understand it. Thanks for the help
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BvU
Okay It seems that I did not or at least I thought I was. Let me take a uniform distribution in the form of ##p(x) = 1/2b##. The characteristic function is given by

$$p(k) = \frac{ie^{-ikx}}{2ak}$$

From here I want to calculate the mean and the variance as I have said before. I want to use this equation

1618137328629.png


so I get

$$ln(\frac{ie^{-ikx}}{2ak}) = ik<x>_c - \frac{k<x^2>_c}{2}$$

$$ln(\frac{i}{2ak})-ikx = ik<x>_c - \frac{k<x^2>_c}{2}$$

but from here I don't know what to do..
 
Arman777 said:
Okay It seems that I did not or at least I thought I was.
...
as I have said before.
Sorry I missed that :wink: -- can't make much sense of the first one and don't believe the second

Interesting thing, this FT aspect of a pdf. Not much in ordinary textbooks, I grant you.I will switch to 'shut up and learn mode' after these comments:
Arman777 said:
The characteristic function is given by
$$p(k) = \frac{ie^{-ikx}}{2ak}$$
This can't be right:
##p(x) = 1/2b## suggests a uniform distribution from ##-b## to ##+b##
So I would expect (using ##\phi(t)##, not ##p(k)## which is confusing)
mathman said:
$$\phi(t)=\int_R e^{itx}f(x)dx$$
something that depends on ##k## and ##b##, but not on ##x## ! (Lazy me: ##\displaystyle{\sin bt\over bt} ##, which I now 'all of a sudden' recognize and remember :cool: -- from the FT world)

By the same token the ##\int x^n p(x)## goodies you want to derive from ##\ \phi(k)\ ## should be convolutions in the ##t## domain (right ?)

##\ ##
 
BvU said:
Not much in ordinary textbooks, I grant you.
Our textbook is really hard to understand since its not for starters..
BvU said:
p(x)=1/2b suggests a uniform distribution from −b to
Yes my mistake, sorry about that. But in our book the notation is p(k) so I cannot use ##\phi(t)##
 
BvU said:
By the same token the ∫xnp(x) goodies you want to derive from ϕ(k) should be convolutions in the t domain (right ?)
I don't know what this means
 
A property of Fourier transforms is that the transform of a product is a convolution vice versa.

##\ ##
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Arman777
  • #10
Okay, this time I really solved the problem. Thanks for the help.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BvU

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K